Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience

Brian M Deal, Haozhi Pan, Varkki Pallathucheril, Gale Fulton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Developing resilience in built human environments is a complex undertaking. It requires decision support tools that can convey complexities in meaningful and understandable ways. Building smart cities and generating big data, however, is not enough. In order to improve decision-making and ultimately inform resilient communities we need to be able to translate big data at scales and in ways that are useful and approachable. In this paper we argue that creating more resilient communities calls for planning support systems (PSSs) that go beyond the ones we have today. We call for PSSs that possess a greater degree of sentience—that (a) possess a greater awareness of application context and user needs; (b) are capable of iterative learning; (c) are capable of spatial and temporal reasoning; (d) understand rules; and (e) are accessible and interactive. We consider the questions: How might intelligent or sentient information delivery systems allow for more strategic, context-aware, resilient, and ultimately sustainable communities? What primary design considerations would make such a system possible and useful given that, as of yet, no technology exists that is fully “sentient?”.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-45
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Urban Technology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017

Fingerprint

resilience
planning
information system
learning
decision making
community
need
decision
smart city

Keywords

  • Sentience
  • planning support systems
  • urban dynamics
  • urban resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems : The Need for Sentience. / Deal, Brian M; Pan, Haozhi; Pallathucheril, Varkki; Fulton, Gale.

In: Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 29-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deal, Brian M ; Pan, Haozhi ; Pallathucheril, Varkki ; Fulton, Gale. / Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems : The Need for Sentience. In: Journal of Urban Technology. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 29-45.
@article{d332dba20f1a46ceb7ed1d4e8b63a3bf,
title = "Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience",
abstract = "Developing resilience in built human environments is a complex undertaking. It requires decision support tools that can convey complexities in meaningful and understandable ways. Building smart cities and generating big data, however, is not enough. In order to improve decision-making and ultimately inform resilient communities we need to be able to translate big data at scales and in ways that are useful and approachable. In this paper we argue that creating more resilient communities calls for planning support systems (PSSs) that go beyond the ones we have today. We call for PSSs that possess a greater degree of sentience—that (a) possess a greater awareness of application context and user needs; (b) are capable of iterative learning; (c) are capable of spatial and temporal reasoning; (d) understand rules; and (e) are accessible and interactive. We consider the questions: How might intelligent or sentient information delivery systems allow for more strategic, context-aware, resilient, and ultimately sustainable communities? What primary design considerations would make such a system possible and useful given that, as of yet, no technology exists that is fully “sentient?”.",
keywords = "Sentience, planning support systems, urban dynamics, urban resilience",
author = "Deal, {Brian M} and Haozhi Pan and Varkki Pallathucheril and Gale Fulton",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "29--45",
journal = "Journal of Urban Technology",
issn = "1063-0732",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems

T2 - The Need for Sentience

AU - Deal, Brian M

AU - Pan, Haozhi

AU - Pallathucheril, Varkki

AU - Fulton, Gale

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - Developing resilience in built human environments is a complex undertaking. It requires decision support tools that can convey complexities in meaningful and understandable ways. Building smart cities and generating big data, however, is not enough. In order to improve decision-making and ultimately inform resilient communities we need to be able to translate big data at scales and in ways that are useful and approachable. In this paper we argue that creating more resilient communities calls for planning support systems (PSSs) that go beyond the ones we have today. We call for PSSs that possess a greater degree of sentience—that (a) possess a greater awareness of application context and user needs; (b) are capable of iterative learning; (c) are capable of spatial and temporal reasoning; (d) understand rules; and (e) are accessible and interactive. We consider the questions: How might intelligent or sentient information delivery systems allow for more strategic, context-aware, resilient, and ultimately sustainable communities? What primary design considerations would make such a system possible and useful given that, as of yet, no technology exists that is fully “sentient?”.

AB - Developing resilience in built human environments is a complex undertaking. It requires decision support tools that can convey complexities in meaningful and understandable ways. Building smart cities and generating big data, however, is not enough. In order to improve decision-making and ultimately inform resilient communities we need to be able to translate big data at scales and in ways that are useful and approachable. In this paper we argue that creating more resilient communities calls for planning support systems (PSSs) that go beyond the ones we have today. We call for PSSs that possess a greater degree of sentience—that (a) possess a greater awareness of application context and user needs; (b) are capable of iterative learning; (c) are capable of spatial and temporal reasoning; (d) understand rules; and (e) are accessible and interactive. We consider the questions: How might intelligent or sentient information delivery systems allow for more strategic, context-aware, resilient, and ultimately sustainable communities? What primary design considerations would make such a system possible and useful given that, as of yet, no technology exists that is fully “sentient?”.

KW - Sentience

KW - planning support systems

KW - urban dynamics

KW - urban resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015694263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015694263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018

DO - 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015694263

VL - 24

SP - 29

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Urban Technology

JF - Journal of Urban Technology

SN - 1063-0732

IS - 1

ER -