TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban Flood Modeling
T2 - Uncertainty Quantification and Physics-Informed Gaussian Processes Regression Forecasting
AU - Kohanpur, Amir H.
AU - Saksena, Siddharth
AU - Dey, Sayan
AU - Johnson, J. Michael
AU - Riasi, M. Sadegh
AU - Yeghiazarian, Lilit
AU - Tartakovsky, Alexandre M.
N1 - The authors thank Peter Singhofen for providing the ICPR license and the City of Minneapolis for sharing the data used in this study. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota. This work is a part of the Urban Flooding Open Knowledge Network (UFOKN) (Phase 1, project number 1937099, and Phase 2, project number 2033607) supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF). A. M. Tartakovsky was partially supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.
The authors thank Peter Singhofen for providing the ICPR license and the City of Minneapolis for sharing the data used in this study. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota. This work is a part of the Urban Flooding Open Knowledge Network (UFOKN) (Phase 1, project number 1937099, and Phase 2, project number 2033607) supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF). A. M. Tartakovsky was partially supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE\u2010AC05\u201076RL01830.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Estimating uncertainty in flood model predictions is important for many applications, including risk assessment and flood forecasting. We focus on uncertainty in physics-based urban flooding models. We consider the effects of the model's complexity and uncertainty in key input parameters. The effect of rainfall intensity on the uncertainty in water depth predictions is also studied. As a test study, we choose the Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing (ICPR) model of a part of the city of Minneapolis. The uncertainty in the ICPR model's predictions of the floodwater depth is quantified in terms of the ensemble variance using the multilevel Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method. Our results show that uncertainties in the studied domain are highly localized. Model simplifications, such as disregarding the groundwater flow, lead to overly confident predictions, that is, predictions that are both less accurate and uncertain than those of the more complex model. We find that for the same number of uncertain parameters, increasing the model resolution reduces uncertainty in the model predictions (and increases the MC method's computational cost). We employ the multilevel MC method to reduce the cost of estimating uncertainty in a high-resolution ICPR model. Finally, we use the ensemble estimates of the mean and covariance of the flood depth for real-time flood depth forecasting using the physics-informed Gaussian process regression method. We show that even with few measurements, the proposed framework results in a more accurate forecast than that provided by the mean prediction of the ICPR model.
AB - Estimating uncertainty in flood model predictions is important for many applications, including risk assessment and flood forecasting. We focus on uncertainty in physics-based urban flooding models. We consider the effects of the model's complexity and uncertainty in key input parameters. The effect of rainfall intensity on the uncertainty in water depth predictions is also studied. As a test study, we choose the Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing (ICPR) model of a part of the city of Minneapolis. The uncertainty in the ICPR model's predictions of the floodwater depth is quantified in terms of the ensemble variance using the multilevel Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method. Our results show that uncertainties in the studied domain are highly localized. Model simplifications, such as disregarding the groundwater flow, lead to overly confident predictions, that is, predictions that are both less accurate and uncertain than those of the more complex model. We find that for the same number of uncertain parameters, increasing the model resolution reduces uncertainty in the model predictions (and increases the MC method's computational cost). We employ the multilevel MC method to reduce the cost of estimating uncertainty in a high-resolution ICPR model. Finally, we use the ensemble estimates of the mean and covariance of the flood depth for real-time flood depth forecasting using the physics-informed Gaussian process regression method. We show that even with few measurements, the proposed framework results in a more accurate forecast than that provided by the mean prediction of the ICPR model.
KW - Gaussian process regression
KW - flooding
KW - forecast
KW - physics-informed machine learning
KW - uncertainty
KW - urban flooding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152577446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152577446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2022WR033939
DO - 10.1029/2022WR033939
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152577446
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 59
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 3
M1 - e2022WR033939
ER -