Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005)

Alejandro Lleras, James T. Enns

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The commentary by S. T. Klapp (2005) on our recent article (A. Lleras & J. T. Enns, 2004) proposes that the empirical finding of negative compatibility in masked priming be attributed to 2 distinct theoretical constructs: (a) perceptual priming through object updating, as described in our article, and (b) nonperceptual priming based on inhibited unconscious response tendencies. The authors argue that this 2nd construct is not supported by either the new data the authors report or the extant literature. Instead, the negative compatibility effect in masked priming is influenced by perceptual interactions among stimuli that appear in the same spatial location, and the authors believe it is this process that deserves further systematic study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-440
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005

Keywords

  • Masking, priming
  • Negative compatibility effect
  • Object updating
  • Unconscious

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming : Reply to Klapp (2005). / Lleras, Alejandro; Enns, James T.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 3, 01.08.2005, p. 436-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{745ff9fce36f4f54839942b63d8b63b6,
title = "Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005)",
abstract = "The commentary by S. T. Klapp (2005) on our recent article (A. Lleras & J. T. Enns, 2004) proposes that the empirical finding of negative compatibility in masked priming be attributed to 2 distinct theoretical constructs: (a) perceptual priming through object updating, as described in our article, and (b) nonperceptual priming based on inhibited unconscious response tendencies. The authors argue that this 2nd construct is not supported by either the new data the authors report or the extant literature. Instead, the negative compatibility effect in masked priming is influenced by perceptual interactions among stimuli that appear in the same spatial location, and the authors believe it is this process that deserves further systematic study.",
keywords = "Masking, priming, Negative compatibility effect, Object updating, Unconscious",
author = "Alejandro Lleras and Enns, {James T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.436",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "436--440",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming

T2 - Reply to Klapp (2005)

AU - Lleras, Alejandro

AU - Enns, James T.

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - The commentary by S. T. Klapp (2005) on our recent article (A. Lleras & J. T. Enns, 2004) proposes that the empirical finding of negative compatibility in masked priming be attributed to 2 distinct theoretical constructs: (a) perceptual priming through object updating, as described in our article, and (b) nonperceptual priming based on inhibited unconscious response tendencies. The authors argue that this 2nd construct is not supported by either the new data the authors report or the extant literature. Instead, the negative compatibility effect in masked priming is influenced by perceptual interactions among stimuli that appear in the same spatial location, and the authors believe it is this process that deserves further systematic study.

AB - The commentary by S. T. Klapp (2005) on our recent article (A. Lleras & J. T. Enns, 2004) proposes that the empirical finding of negative compatibility in masked priming be attributed to 2 distinct theoretical constructs: (a) perceptual priming through object updating, as described in our article, and (b) nonperceptual priming based on inhibited unconscious response tendencies. The authors argue that this 2nd construct is not supported by either the new data the authors report or the extant literature. Instead, the negative compatibility effect in masked priming is influenced by perceptual interactions among stimuli that appear in the same spatial location, and the authors believe it is this process that deserves further systematic study.

KW - Masking, priming

KW - Negative compatibility effect

KW - Object updating

KW - Unconscious

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944468104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24944468104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.436

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.436

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:24944468104

VL - 134

SP - 436

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -