Unpacking the Relationship Between Customer (In)Justice and Employee Turnover Outcomes: Can Fair Supervisor Treatment Reduce Employees’ Emotional Turmoil?

Danielle D. van Jaarsveld, David D. Walker, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Daniel Skarlicki, Yueyang Chen, Pascale H. Frické

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Service employees can experience considerable resource demands from customers and supervisors in their day-to-day work. Guided by the conservation of resources (COR) perspective and organizational justice research, we explored the relationship between interpersonal injustice (e.g., being treated with low dignity and respect) by customers and employee turnover (e.g., voluntary turnover, turnover intentions). Specifically, we proposed that customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employee turnover outcomes through a process first involving employee experiences of negative emotions, and second, employee emotional exhaustion. We also examined whether supervisor interpersonal justice mitigates this process by providing emotional resources that buffer the demands of customer interpersonal injustice. We evaluated these predictions in a programmatic series of three complementary field studies involving retail employees (Study 1, N = 263), restaurant employees (Study 2, N = 206), and contact center employees (Study 3, N = 317). The results showed that (a) customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employees’ negative emotions, (b) employee negative emotions are positively associated with emotional exhaustion, and (c) emotional exhaustion relates to higher employee turnover outcomes. Our results also show that the indirect effect of customer interpersonal injustice on employee turnover intentions (Study 2) and voluntary turnover (Study 3) is weaker when employees perceive more (vs. less) supervisor interpersonal justice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Service Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
turnover
customer
justice
employee
Personnel
burnout
emotion
Customer relationship
Employee turnover
Employees
Emotion
Supervisors
Justice
resources
Conservation
respect
experience
conservation
contact

Keywords

  • conditional indirect effects
  • conservation of resources theory
  • customer interpersonal injustice
  • organizational justice
  • voluntary turnover

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Unpacking the Relationship Between Customer (In)Justice and Employee Turnover Outcomes : Can Fair Supervisor Treatment Reduce Employees’ Emotional Turmoil? / van Jaarsveld, Danielle D.; Walker, David D.; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.; Skarlicki, Daniel; Chen, Yueyang; Frické, Pascale H.

In: Journal of Service Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{522d2eaf16c74d89901a21daf4669da3,
title = "Unpacking the Relationship Between Customer (In)Justice and Employee Turnover Outcomes: Can Fair Supervisor Treatment Reduce Employees’ Emotional Turmoil?",
abstract = "Service employees can experience considerable resource demands from customers and supervisors in their day-to-day work. Guided by the conservation of resources (COR) perspective and organizational justice research, we explored the relationship between interpersonal injustice (e.g., being treated with low dignity and respect) by customers and employee turnover (e.g., voluntary turnover, turnover intentions). Specifically, we proposed that customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employee turnover outcomes through a process first involving employee experiences of negative emotions, and second, employee emotional exhaustion. We also examined whether supervisor interpersonal justice mitigates this process by providing emotional resources that buffer the demands of customer interpersonal injustice. We evaluated these predictions in a programmatic series of three complementary field studies involving retail employees (Study 1, N = 263), restaurant employees (Study 2, N = 206), and contact center employees (Study 3, N = 317). The results showed that (a) customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employees’ negative emotions, (b) employee negative emotions are positively associated with emotional exhaustion, and (c) emotional exhaustion relates to higher employee turnover outcomes. Our results also show that the indirect effect of customer interpersonal injustice on employee turnover intentions (Study 2) and voluntary turnover (Study 3) is weaker when employees perceive more (vs. less) supervisor interpersonal justice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "conditional indirect effects, conservation of resources theory, customer interpersonal injustice, organizational justice, voluntary turnover",
author = "{van Jaarsveld}, {Danielle D.} and Walker, {David D.} and Restubog, {Simon Lloyd D.} and Daniel Skarlicki and Yueyang Chen and Frick{\'e}, {Pascale H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094670519883949",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Service Research",
issn = "1094-6705",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the Relationship Between Customer (In)Justice and Employee Turnover Outcomes

T2 - Can Fair Supervisor Treatment Reduce Employees’ Emotional Turmoil?

AU - van Jaarsveld, Danielle D.

AU - Walker, David D.

AU - Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.

AU - Skarlicki, Daniel

AU - Chen, Yueyang

AU - Frické, Pascale H.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Service employees can experience considerable resource demands from customers and supervisors in their day-to-day work. Guided by the conservation of resources (COR) perspective and organizational justice research, we explored the relationship between interpersonal injustice (e.g., being treated with low dignity and respect) by customers and employee turnover (e.g., voluntary turnover, turnover intentions). Specifically, we proposed that customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employee turnover outcomes through a process first involving employee experiences of negative emotions, and second, employee emotional exhaustion. We also examined whether supervisor interpersonal justice mitigates this process by providing emotional resources that buffer the demands of customer interpersonal injustice. We evaluated these predictions in a programmatic series of three complementary field studies involving retail employees (Study 1, N = 263), restaurant employees (Study 2, N = 206), and contact center employees (Study 3, N = 317). The results showed that (a) customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employees’ negative emotions, (b) employee negative emotions are positively associated with emotional exhaustion, and (c) emotional exhaustion relates to higher employee turnover outcomes. Our results also show that the indirect effect of customer interpersonal injustice on employee turnover intentions (Study 2) and voluntary turnover (Study 3) is weaker when employees perceive more (vs. less) supervisor interpersonal justice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

AB - Service employees can experience considerable resource demands from customers and supervisors in their day-to-day work. Guided by the conservation of resources (COR) perspective and organizational justice research, we explored the relationship between interpersonal injustice (e.g., being treated with low dignity and respect) by customers and employee turnover (e.g., voluntary turnover, turnover intentions). Specifically, we proposed that customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employee turnover outcomes through a process first involving employee experiences of negative emotions, and second, employee emotional exhaustion. We also examined whether supervisor interpersonal justice mitigates this process by providing emotional resources that buffer the demands of customer interpersonal injustice. We evaluated these predictions in a programmatic series of three complementary field studies involving retail employees (Study 1, N = 263), restaurant employees (Study 2, N = 206), and contact center employees (Study 3, N = 317). The results showed that (a) customer interpersonal injustice relates positively to employees’ negative emotions, (b) employee negative emotions are positively associated with emotional exhaustion, and (c) emotional exhaustion relates to higher employee turnover outcomes. Our results also show that the indirect effect of customer interpersonal injustice on employee turnover intentions (Study 2) and voluntary turnover (Study 3) is weaker when employees perceive more (vs. less) supervisor interpersonal justice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

KW - conditional indirect effects

KW - conservation of resources theory

KW - customer interpersonal injustice

KW - organizational justice

KW - voluntary turnover

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074670144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074670144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1094670519883949

DO - 10.1177/1094670519883949

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074670144

JO - Journal of Service Research

JF - Journal of Service Research

SN - 1094-6705

ER -