TY - GEN
T1 - Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice
AU - Sharma, Tanusree
AU - Potter, Yujin
AU - Pongmala, Kornrapat
AU - Wang, Henry
AU - Miller, Andrew
AU - Song, Dawn
AU - Wang, Yang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of (pseudonymous) entities toward a shared vision (e.g., promoting sustainability). In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how these DAOs actually work in practice. Given this, we aim to unpack how (well) DAOs work in practice. We conducted an in-depth analysis of a diverse set of 10 DAOs of various categories and smart contracts, leveraging on-chain data and interviewing DAO members. Specifically, we define metrics to characterize key aspects of DAOs, such as the degrees of decentralization and autonomy. We observed some DAOs having poor decentralization in voting, while decentralization has improved over time for one-person-one-vote DAOs. Lastly, we offer a set of design implications for future DAOs based on our findings.
AB - Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of (pseudonymous) entities toward a shared vision (e.g., promoting sustainability). In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how these DAOs actually work in practice. Given this, we aim to unpack how (well) DAOs work in practice. We conducted an in-depth analysis of a diverse set of 10 DAOs of various categories and smart contracts, leveraging on-chain data and interviewing DAO members. Specifically, we define metrics to characterize key aspects of DAOs, such as the degrees of decentralization and autonomy. We observed some DAOs having poor decentralization in voting, while decentralization has improved over time for one-person-one-vote DAOs. Lastly, we offer a set of design implications for future DAOs based on our findings.
KW - Autonomy
KW - DAO
KW - Decentralization
KW - Empirical
KW - Metrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203513795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203513795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634404
DO - 10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634404
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85203513795
T3 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, ICBC 2024
SP - 416
EP - 424
BT - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, ICBC 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 6th IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, ICBC 2024
Y2 - 27 May 2024 through 31 May 2024
ER -