TY - JOUR
T1 - Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation
T2 - A statistical modeling approach
AU - Cole, Jennifer
AU - Linebaugh, Gary
AU - Munson, Cheyenne
AU - McMurray, Bob
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part through National Institutes of Health Grant DC-008089 (Bob McMurray). We thank Joe Toscano and José Hualde for provocative questions and helpful discussion related to the ideas presented here.
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Coarticulation is a source of acoustic variability for vowels, but how large is this effect relative to other sources of variance? We investigate acoustic effects of anticipatory V-to-V coarticulation relative to variation due to the following C and individual speaker. We examine F1 and F2 from V1 in 48 V1-C#V2 contexts produced by 10 speakers of American English. ANOVA reveals significant effects of both V2 and C on F1 and F2 measures of V1. The influence of V2 and C on acoustic variability relative to that of speaker and target vowel identity is evaluated using hierarchical linear regression. Speaker and target vowel account for roughly 80% of the total variance in F1 and F2, but when this variance is partialed out C and V2 account for another 18% (F1) and 63% (F2) of the remaining target vowel variability. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) models are constructed to test the power of target vowel F1 and F2 for predicting C and V2 of the upcoming context. Prediction accuracy is 58% for C-Place, 76% for C-Voicing and 54% for V2, but only when variance due to other sources is factored out. MLR is discussed as a model of the parsing mechanism in speech perception.
AB - Coarticulation is a source of acoustic variability for vowels, but how large is this effect relative to other sources of variance? We investigate acoustic effects of anticipatory V-to-V coarticulation relative to variation due to the following C and individual speaker. We examine F1 and F2 from V1 in 48 V1-C#V2 contexts produced by 10 speakers of American English. ANOVA reveals significant effects of both V2 and C on F1 and F2 measures of V1. The influence of V2 and C on acoustic variability relative to that of speaker and target vowel identity is evaluated using hierarchical linear regression. Speaker and target vowel account for roughly 80% of the total variance in F1 and F2, but when this variance is partialed out C and V2 account for another 18% (F1) and 63% (F2) of the remaining target vowel variability. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) models are constructed to test the power of target vowel F1 and F2 for predicting C and V2 of the upcoming context. Prediction accuracy is 58% for C-Place, 76% for C-Voicing and 54% for V2, but only when variance due to other sources is factored out. MLR is discussed as a model of the parsing mechanism in speech perception.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952546872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952546872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 21173864
AN - SCOPUS:77952546872
SN - 0095-4470
VL - 38
SP - 167
EP - 184
JO - Journal of Phonetics
JF - Journal of Phonetics
IS - 2
ER -