Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes

  • Thomas A. Bledsoe
  • , Janet A. Jokela
  • , Noel N. Deep
  • , Lois Snyder Sulmasy

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

These authors share thoughts about discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during health care catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that, although prioritization of resources is critical, fairness requires giving each patient his or her due based on clinical criteria applied to the individual rather than assumptions that favor or disfavor groups.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-232
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume173
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
  • Novel coronavirus
  • 2019-nCoV
  • Pandemic
  • quality of life
  • patient advocacy
  • resuscitation
  • prevention, policy, and public health
  • life expectancy
  • elderly
  • treatment guidelines
  • ventilators
  • triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this