Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes

Thomas A. Bledsoe; Janet A. Jokela; Noel N. Deep; Lois Snyder Sulmasy

doi:10.7326/M20-1862

Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes

Thomas A. Bledsoe, Janet A. Jokela, Noel N. Deep, Lois Snyder Sulmasy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

These authors share thoughts about discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during health care catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that, although prioritization of resources is critical, fairness requires giving each patient his or her due based on clinical criteria applied to the individual rather than assumptions that favor or disfavor groups.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	230-232
Number of pages	3
Journal	Annals of internal medicine
Volume	173
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1862
State	Published - Aug 4 2020

Keywords

Coronavirus
COVID-19
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Novel coronavirus
2019-nCoV
Pandemic
quality of life
patient advocacy
resuscitation
prevention, policy, and public health
life expectancy
elderly
treatment guidelines
ventilators
triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Internal Medicine

Online availability

10.7326/M20-1862

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes. / Bledsoe, Thomas A.; Jokela, Janet A.; Deep, Noel N. et al.
In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 173, No. 3, 04.08.2020, p. 230-232.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

@article{1ccdb445c51c4e8f819156b50bf14a6d,

title = "Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes",

abstract = "These authors share thoughts about discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during health care catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that, although prioritization of resources is critical, fairness requires giving each patient his or her due based on clinical criteria applied to the individual rather than assumptions that favor or disfavor groups.",

keywords = "Coronavirus, COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, Pandemic, quality of life, patient advocacy, resuscitation, prevention, policy, and public health, life expectancy, elderly, treatment guidelines, ventilators, triage",

author = "Bledsoe, {Thomas A.} and Jokela, {Janet A.} and Deep, {Noel N.} and {Snyder Sulmasy}, Lois",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "4",

doi = "10.7326/M20-1862",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "173",

pages = "230--232",

journal = "Annals of internal medicine",

issn = "0003-4819",

publisher = "American College of Physicians",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes

AU - Bledsoe, Thomas A.

AU - Jokela, Janet A.

AU - Deep, Noel N.

AU - Snyder Sulmasy, Lois

PY - 2020/8/4

Y1 - 2020/8/4

N2 - These authors share thoughts about discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during health care catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that, although prioritization of resources is critical, fairness requires giving each patient his or her due based on clinical criteria applied to the individual rather than assumptions that favor or disfavor groups.

AB - These authors share thoughts about discriminatory approaches to the allocation of resources during health care catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that, although prioritization of resources is critical, fairness requires giving each patient his or her due based on clinical criteria applied to the individual rather than assumptions that favor or disfavor groups.

KW - Coronavirus

KW - COVID-19

KW - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

KW - Novel coronavirus

KW - 2019-nCoV

KW - Pandemic

KW - quality of life

KW - patient advocacy

KW - resuscitation

KW - prevention, policy, and public health

KW - life expectancy

KW - elderly

KW - treatment guidelines

KW - ventilators

KW - triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086782412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086782412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M20-1862

DO - 10.7326/M20-1862

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 32330235

SN - 0003-4819

VL - 173

SP - 230

EP - 232

JO - Annals of internal medicine

JF - Annals of internal medicine

IS - 3

ER -

Universal Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Social Worth, and Life-Years: Opposing Discriminatory Approaches to the Allocation of Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Health System Catastrophes

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this