Universal design for learning in physical education: Overview and critical reflection

Justin A. Haegele, Steven K. Holland, Wesley J. Wilson, Anthony J. Maher, T. N. Kirk, Aaron Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-264
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Physical Education Review
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Keywords

  • Inclusion
  • adapted physical education
  • disability
  • legal and policy
  • social justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Universal design for learning in physical education: Overview and critical reflection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this