Unintended, but still blameworthy: the roles of awareness, desire, and anger in negligence, restitution, and punishment

Sean M. Laurent, Narina L. Nuñez, Kimberly A. Schweitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments (Experiment 1 N = 149, Experiment 2 N = 141) investigated how two mental states that underlie how perceivers reason about intentional action (awareness of action and desire for an outcome) influence blame and punishment for unintended (i.e., negligent) harms, and the role of anger in this process. Specifically, this research explores how the presence of awareness (of risk in acting, or simply of acting) and/or desire in an acting agent's mental states influences perceptions of negligence, judgements that the acting agent owes restitution to a victim, and the desire to punish the agent, mediated by anger. In both experiments, awareness and desire led to increased anger at the agent and increased perception of negligence. Anger mediated the effect of awareness and desire on negligence rather than negligence mediating the effect of mental states on anger. Anger also mediated punishment, and negligence mediated the effects of anger on restitution. We discuss how perceivers consider mental states such as awareness, desire, and knowledge when reasoning about blame and punishment for unintended harms, and the role of anger in this process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1271-1288
Number of pages18
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Punishment
Malpractice
Anger
Restitution
Negligence
Experiment
Mental State
Research

Keywords

  • Awareness
  • anger
  • blame
  • desire
  • intentionality
  • negligence
  • punishment
  • restitution
  • social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Unintended, but still blameworthy : the roles of awareness, desire, and anger in negligence, restitution, and punishment. / Laurent, Sean M.; Nuñez, Narina L.; Schweitzer, Kimberly A.

In: Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 30, No. 7, 02.10.2016, p. 1271-1288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4bf1f130e85640aeade95157987a4e6a,
title = "Unintended, but still blameworthy: the roles of awareness, desire, and anger in negligence, restitution, and punishment",
abstract = "Two experiments (Experiment 1 N = 149, Experiment 2 N = 141) investigated how two mental states that underlie how perceivers reason about intentional action (awareness of action and desire for an outcome) influence blame and punishment for unintended (i.e., negligent) harms, and the role of anger in this process. Specifically, this research explores how the presence of awareness (of risk in acting, or simply of acting) and/or desire in an acting agent's mental states influences perceptions of negligence, judgements that the acting agent owes restitution to a victim, and the desire to punish the agent, mediated by anger. In both experiments, awareness and desire led to increased anger at the agent and increased perception of negligence. Anger mediated the effect of awareness and desire on negligence rather than negligence mediating the effect of mental states on anger. Anger also mediated punishment, and negligence mediated the effects of anger on restitution. We discuss how perceivers consider mental states such as awareness, desire, and knowledge when reasoning about blame and punishment for unintended harms, and the role of anger in this process.",
keywords = "Awareness, anger, blame, desire, intentionality, negligence, punishment, restitution, social cognition",
author = "Laurent, {Sean M.} and Nu{\~n}ez, {Narina L.} and Schweitzer, {Kimberly A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02699931.2015.1058242",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1271--1288",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unintended, but still blameworthy

T2 - the roles of awareness, desire, and anger in negligence, restitution, and punishment

AU - Laurent, Sean M.

AU - Nuñez, Narina L.

AU - Schweitzer, Kimberly A.

PY - 2016/10/2

Y1 - 2016/10/2

N2 - Two experiments (Experiment 1 N = 149, Experiment 2 N = 141) investigated how two mental states that underlie how perceivers reason about intentional action (awareness of action and desire for an outcome) influence blame and punishment for unintended (i.e., negligent) harms, and the role of anger in this process. Specifically, this research explores how the presence of awareness (of risk in acting, or simply of acting) and/or desire in an acting agent's mental states influences perceptions of negligence, judgements that the acting agent owes restitution to a victim, and the desire to punish the agent, mediated by anger. In both experiments, awareness and desire led to increased anger at the agent and increased perception of negligence. Anger mediated the effect of awareness and desire on negligence rather than negligence mediating the effect of mental states on anger. Anger also mediated punishment, and negligence mediated the effects of anger on restitution. We discuss how perceivers consider mental states such as awareness, desire, and knowledge when reasoning about blame and punishment for unintended harms, and the role of anger in this process.

AB - Two experiments (Experiment 1 N = 149, Experiment 2 N = 141) investigated how two mental states that underlie how perceivers reason about intentional action (awareness of action and desire for an outcome) influence blame and punishment for unintended (i.e., negligent) harms, and the role of anger in this process. Specifically, this research explores how the presence of awareness (of risk in acting, or simply of acting) and/or desire in an acting agent's mental states influences perceptions of negligence, judgements that the acting agent owes restitution to a victim, and the desire to punish the agent, mediated by anger. In both experiments, awareness and desire led to increased anger at the agent and increased perception of negligence. Anger mediated the effect of awareness and desire on negligence rather than negligence mediating the effect of mental states on anger. Anger also mediated punishment, and negligence mediated the effects of anger on restitution. We discuss how perceivers consider mental states such as awareness, desire, and knowledge when reasoning about blame and punishment for unintended harms, and the role of anger in this process.

KW - Awareness

KW - anger

KW - blame

KW - desire

KW - intentionality

KW - negligence

KW - punishment

KW - restitution

KW - social cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939210294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939210294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2015.1058242

DO - 10.1080/02699931.2015.1058242

M3 - Article

C2 - 26220450

AN - SCOPUS:84939210294

VL - 30

SP - 1271

EP - 1288

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 7

ER -