TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the differences in collaborative system use through appropriation analysis
AU - Desanctis, Gerardine
AU - Poole, Marshall Scott
N1 - Funding Information:
The assistance of Professor Karlyn Khors Campbell in developing the coding system described in this paper is gratefully acknowledged. This research is supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. SES-8715565 and by a grant from NCR Corporation. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and not of the research sponsors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 1991 IEEE.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - One way of understanding the impacts of collaborative systems is to examine the nature of the structures they provide. Another approach is to examine the differences in how groups respond to these structures as they work with them. This paper follows the second approach, on the presumption that groups differ dramatically in how they incorporate technology-based structures into their work We draw on the concept of appropriation, the process by which group members provide meaning to structures and act on them, and identify nine general types of group responses to technology-based structures. These nine types are then refined into 31 categories of appropriation. We illustrate how these categories of appropriation can be observed in groups and show how they can be synthesized to yield general patterns of group responses to the technology.
AB - One way of understanding the impacts of collaborative systems is to examine the nature of the structures they provide. Another approach is to examine the differences in how groups respond to these structures as they work with them. This paper follows the second approach, on the presumption that groups differ dramatically in how they incorporate technology-based structures into their work We draw on the concept of appropriation, the process by which group members provide meaning to structures and act on them, and identify nine general types of group responses to technology-based structures. These nine types are then refined into 31 categories of appropriation. We illustrate how these categories of appropriation can be observed in groups and show how they can be synthesized to yield general patterns of group responses to the technology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951753074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951753074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184186
DO - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184186
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:77951753074
SN - 1530-1605
VL - 3
SP - 547
EP - 553
JO - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
M1 - 184186
T2 - 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 1991
Y2 - 8 January 1991 through 11 January 1991
ER -