Understanding prosocial and antisocial behaviours: The roles of self-focused and other-focused motivational orientations

Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Hyun Euh, Alexandra Scharmer, Mark Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine how individual differences in self-focused and other-focused orientations relate to prosocial (e.g., helping, volunteerism) and antisocial (e.g., theft, violence) behaviours/attitudes. Using four datasets (total N = 176,216; across 78 countries), we find that other-focused orientations (e.g., socially focused values, intimacy motivation, compassionate/communal traits) generally relate positively to prosocial outcomes and negatively to antisocial outcomes. These effects are highly consistent cross-nationally and across multiple ways of operationalizing constructs. In contrast, self-focused orientations (e.g., personally focused values, power motivation, assertive/agentic traits) tend to relate positively to both antisocial and prosocial outcomes. However, associations with prosocial outcomes vary substantially across nations and construct operationalizations. Overall, the effects of other-focused orientations are consistently larger than those of self-focused orientations. We discuss the implications of these findings for interventions that target self-focused and other-focused motivations to influence prosocial and antisocial outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1610-1643
Number of pages34
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume54
Issue number7
Early online dateSep 18 2024
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Sep 18 2024

Keywords

  • antisocial behaviour and aggression
  • egoistic and altruistic motivations
  • interpersonal circumplex
  • other-focused orientations
  • prosocial behaviour
  • self-focused orientations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding prosocial and antisocial behaviours: The roles of self-focused and other-focused motivational orientations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this