Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis

Kelsey L. Schreiber, Luis F Rodriguez, Ann Perry Witmer, Brian J Dill

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

As water becomes increasingly scarce, it becomes more important to ensure its reliable access, especially in rural areas dependent on agriculture for both national food security and personal livelihoods. Too often the aid that is funneled to support these rural regions results in poor project sustainability and resiliency. With a variety of major actors in these project implementations, the actual definition of an achievable and successful project remains elusive. This research seeks to better understand how projects are evaluated from the perspectives of four main stakeholders: engineer, funder, government, and international NGO. We have used text mining analysis on a novel Stakeholder Evaluation Database (SED) to find representative phrases for each of the main stakeholders. Using cosine similarity, we compare top phrases across stakeholders and find evidence of differing priorities. While most stakeholder comparisons showed convergence, funders and international NGOs remain relatively dissimilar, a surprising result from stakeholders that often must interact closely throughout the project process. We also find a lack of available information on the opinions of the recipients of projects. This process is a first step in recognizing the differing priorities of stakeholders. Further refinement of the method seeks to include the recipient community perspectives, giving a voice to those most dependent upon and vulnerable to the success or failure of international engineering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Event2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting - Boston, United States
Duration: Jul 7 2019Jul 10 2019

Conference

Conference2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting
CountryUnited States
CityBoston
Period7/7/197/10/19

Fingerprint

stakeholders
engineering
Agriculture
Sustainable development
Engineers
Water
rural areas
livelihood
food security
engineers
agriculture
water

Keywords

  • Big data
  • Contextual engineering
  • International development
  • Phrase mining
  • Project evaluation
  • Rural water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Bioengineering

Cite this

Schreiber, K. L., Rodriguez, L. F., Witmer, A. P., & Dill, B. J. (2019). Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis. Paper presented at 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201901425

Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering : A phrase mining analysis. / Schreiber, Kelsey L.; Rodriguez, Luis F; Witmer, Ann Perry; Dill, Brian J.

2019. Paper presented at 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Schreiber, KL, Rodriguez, LF, Witmer, AP & Dill, BJ 2019, 'Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis' Paper presented at 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, United States, 7/7/19 - 7/10/19, . https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201901425
Schreiber KL, Rodriguez LF, Witmer AP, Dill BJ. Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis. 2019. Paper presented at 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201901425
Schreiber, Kelsey L. ; Rodriguez, Luis F ; Witmer, Ann Perry ; Dill, Brian J. / Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering : A phrase mining analysis. Paper presented at 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, United States.
@conference{295a95d668ff40999a373f6dc554f5f5,
title = "Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis",
abstract = "As water becomes increasingly scarce, it becomes more important to ensure its reliable access, especially in rural areas dependent on agriculture for both national food security and personal livelihoods. Too often the aid that is funneled to support these rural regions results in poor project sustainability and resiliency. With a variety of major actors in these project implementations, the actual definition of an achievable and successful project remains elusive. This research seeks to better understand how projects are evaluated from the perspectives of four main stakeholders: engineer, funder, government, and international NGO. We have used text mining analysis on a novel Stakeholder Evaluation Database (SED) to find representative phrases for each of the main stakeholders. Using cosine similarity, we compare top phrases across stakeholders and find evidence of differing priorities. While most stakeholder comparisons showed convergence, funders and international NGOs remain relatively dissimilar, a surprising result from stakeholders that often must interact closely throughout the project process. We also find a lack of available information on the opinions of the recipients of projects. This process is a first step in recognizing the differing priorities of stakeholders. Further refinement of the method seeks to include the recipient community perspectives, giving a voice to those most dependent upon and vulnerable to the success or failure of international engineering.",
keywords = "Big data, Contextual engineering, International development, Phrase mining, Project evaluation, Rural water",
author = "Schreiber, {Kelsey L.} and Rodriguez, {Luis F} and Witmer, {Ann Perry} and Dill, {Brian J}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/aim.201901425",
language = "English (US)",
note = "2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting ; Conference date: 07-07-2019 Through 10-07-2019",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering

T2 - A phrase mining analysis

AU - Schreiber, Kelsey L.

AU - Rodriguez, Luis F

AU - Witmer, Ann Perry

AU - Dill, Brian J

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - As water becomes increasingly scarce, it becomes more important to ensure its reliable access, especially in rural areas dependent on agriculture for both national food security and personal livelihoods. Too often the aid that is funneled to support these rural regions results in poor project sustainability and resiliency. With a variety of major actors in these project implementations, the actual definition of an achievable and successful project remains elusive. This research seeks to better understand how projects are evaluated from the perspectives of four main stakeholders: engineer, funder, government, and international NGO. We have used text mining analysis on a novel Stakeholder Evaluation Database (SED) to find representative phrases for each of the main stakeholders. Using cosine similarity, we compare top phrases across stakeholders and find evidence of differing priorities. While most stakeholder comparisons showed convergence, funders and international NGOs remain relatively dissimilar, a surprising result from stakeholders that often must interact closely throughout the project process. We also find a lack of available information on the opinions of the recipients of projects. This process is a first step in recognizing the differing priorities of stakeholders. Further refinement of the method seeks to include the recipient community perspectives, giving a voice to those most dependent upon and vulnerable to the success or failure of international engineering.

AB - As water becomes increasingly scarce, it becomes more important to ensure its reliable access, especially in rural areas dependent on agriculture for both national food security and personal livelihoods. Too often the aid that is funneled to support these rural regions results in poor project sustainability and resiliency. With a variety of major actors in these project implementations, the actual definition of an achievable and successful project remains elusive. This research seeks to better understand how projects are evaluated from the perspectives of four main stakeholders: engineer, funder, government, and international NGO. We have used text mining analysis on a novel Stakeholder Evaluation Database (SED) to find representative phrases for each of the main stakeholders. Using cosine similarity, we compare top phrases across stakeholders and find evidence of differing priorities. While most stakeholder comparisons showed convergence, funders and international NGOs remain relatively dissimilar, a surprising result from stakeholders that often must interact closely throughout the project process. We also find a lack of available information on the opinions of the recipients of projects. This process is a first step in recognizing the differing priorities of stakeholders. Further refinement of the method seeks to include the recipient community perspectives, giving a voice to those most dependent upon and vulnerable to the success or failure of international engineering.

KW - Big data

KW - Contextual engineering

KW - International development

KW - Phrase mining

KW - Project evaluation

KW - Rural water

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072931876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072931876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/aim.201901425

DO - 10.13031/aim.201901425

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85072931876

ER -