TY - JOUR
T1 - Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention
T2 - Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions
AU - Cromley, Jennifer G.
AU - Perez, Tony
AU - Kaplan, Avi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2015.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Student cognition and motivation, as well as institutional policies, determine student course grades and retention in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Regarding cognition, study skills relate to course grades, and grades relate to retention in STEM. Several aspects of motivation are related to both grades and retention in STEM: self-efficacy (self-confidence for completing assignments), continuing interest in learning more about the subject, and effort control (remaining focused on classes and studying). Students’ cognition and motivation are interdependent, and, furthermore, they play out in the context of multiple institutional policies, such as academic support centers, career counseling, financial aid policies, forced curving of course grades, course timing, and course registration policies. All of these interdependent factors can improve with targeted programs that complement each other. Some challenges for reform include instructor resistance to changing teaching and a lack of coordination, or even competing emphases, among university policies and resources, such as course scheduling, academic support, advising, career counseling, and financial aid.
AB - Student cognition and motivation, as well as institutional policies, determine student course grades and retention in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Regarding cognition, study skills relate to course grades, and grades relate to retention in STEM. Several aspects of motivation are related to both grades and retention in STEM: self-efficacy (self-confidence for completing assignments), continuing interest in learning more about the subject, and effort control (remaining focused on classes and studying). Students’ cognition and motivation are interdependent, and, furthermore, they play out in the context of multiple institutional policies, such as academic support centers, career counseling, financial aid policies, forced curving of course grades, course timing, and course registration policies. All of these interdependent factors can improve with targeted programs that complement each other. Some challenges for reform include instructor resistance to changing teaching and a lack of coordination, or even competing emphases, among university policies and resources, such as course scheduling, academic support, advising, career counseling, and financial aid.
KW - STEM achievement
KW - STEM retention
KW - cognition
KW - institutional barriers
KW - motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012927812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012927812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2372732215622648
DO - 10.1177/2372732215622648
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85012927812
SN - 2372-7322
VL - 3
SP - 4
EP - 11
JO - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
IS - 1
ER -