Abstract
Soil erodibility accounts for the influence of the intrinsic soil properties on soil erosion and is one of six factors in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), a most widely used model to predict long-term average annual soil loss. In a traditional soil survey, each of the soil types (classes) is assigned with a soil erodibility value that is assumed to be constant over time. However, heterogeneity of soil in time and in space tends to support the concept that soil erodibility depends dynamically and spatially on the set of properties of a specific soil. This study statistically compared the published soil erodibility values with those from a set of soil samples in terms of their differences. The published values tend to underestimate soil erodibility. This feature is also supported by the uncertainty assessment in difference maps of the published K values versus those from soil samples. Spatial prediction and uncertainty analysis of the soil erodibility from the set of soil samples was carried out using a sequential Gaussian simulation. The results show that the simulation produces a reliable prediction map of soil erodibility and can be recommended as a monitoring strategy to spatially update soil erodibility.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Catena |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 20 2001 |
Keywords
- Simulation
- Soil erodibility
- Spatial prediction
- Uncertainty assessment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth-Surface Processes