TY - GEN
T1 - Uncertainties in discharges determined from index-velocity ratings
AU - Schmidt, Arthur
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) for financial support under NYSERDA grant 15886 .
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Time-series data describing the rate of flow of water (discharge), along with a description of the uncertainty in the reported discharges, are essential for most water-resources analyses, designs, and decision making. Direct measurement of discharge, however, is impractical; thus, most discharge records are developed using empirical ratings to estimate the discharge based on measured water stages. For many streams, however, the stage alone is insufficient to determine the discharge. Advances in hydroacoustics over the past decade have resulted in a family of rating methods that use the velocity measured for a subsection of the flow area ("index velocity") as a second parameter to estimate the discharge. While different methods have been utilized to incorporate the velocity data into discharge ratings, the method that is becoming widely accepted is the "Index-velocity method," in which an empirical rating between the index velocity and the cross-section mean velocity is developed. Index-velocity methods are being widely adopted and a few studies have examined the uncertainties in the resulting discharges from a statistical perspective. However, the uncertainties in these ratings have generally been lumped into "goodness-of-fit" statistics such as the standard error of regression. This approach precludes estimating the portion of the discharge uncertainty from different sources (e.g., instrument precision, temporal variations in the flow, percentage of the cross section measured, etc.). Without identification of the sources of uncertainty and quantification of their effect on the discharges, selection of instrument precision, number of sampling points, frequency and duration of index-velocity measurements, frequency and duration of rating measurements, etc. becomes a 'seat-of-the-pants' exercise rather than a rational scientific design. This paper presents an overview of potential sources of uncertainty in index-velocity ratings and demonstrates use of reliability-analysis methods to synthesize these into an estimate of the uncertainty in the calculated discharges. An example applications to an index-velocity gauging station illustrates the relative significance of different sources of uncertainty.
AB - Time-series data describing the rate of flow of water (discharge), along with a description of the uncertainty in the reported discharges, are essential for most water-resources analyses, designs, and decision making. Direct measurement of discharge, however, is impractical; thus, most discharge records are developed using empirical ratings to estimate the discharge based on measured water stages. For many streams, however, the stage alone is insufficient to determine the discharge. Advances in hydroacoustics over the past decade have resulted in a family of rating methods that use the velocity measured for a subsection of the flow area ("index velocity") as a second parameter to estimate the discharge. While different methods have been utilized to incorporate the velocity data into discharge ratings, the method that is becoming widely accepted is the "Index-velocity method," in which an empirical rating between the index velocity and the cross-section mean velocity is developed. Index-velocity methods are being widely adopted and a few studies have examined the uncertainties in the resulting discharges from a statistical perspective. However, the uncertainties in these ratings have generally been lumped into "goodness-of-fit" statistics such as the standard error of regression. This approach precludes estimating the portion of the discharge uncertainty from different sources (e.g., instrument precision, temporal variations in the flow, percentage of the cross section measured, etc.). Without identification of the sources of uncertainty and quantification of their effect on the discharges, selection of instrument precision, number of sampling points, frequency and duration of index-velocity measurements, frequency and duration of rating measurements, etc. becomes a 'seat-of-the-pants' exercise rather than a rational scientific design. This paper presents an overview of potential sources of uncertainty in index-velocity ratings and demonstrates use of reliability-analysis methods to synthesize these into an estimate of the uncertainty in the calculated discharges. An example applications to an index-velocity gauging station illustrates the relative significance of different sources of uncertainty.
KW - Flow rates
KW - Uncertainty principles
KW - Velocity
KW - Water flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855182019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855182019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/40856(200)163
DO - 10.1061/40856(200)163
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84855182019
SN - 0784408564
SN - 9780784408568
T3 - Examining the Confluence of Environmental and Water Concerns - Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2006
BT - Examining the Confluence of Environmental and Water Concerns - Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2006
T2 - World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2006: Examining the Confluence of Environmental and Water Concerns
Y2 - 21 May 2006 through 25 May 2006
ER -