Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs

Rose M. Scott, Cynthia L Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two-year-olds assign appropriate interpretations to verbs presented in two English transitivity alternations, the causal and unspecified-object alternations (Naigles, 1996). Here we explored how they might do so. Causal and unspecified-object verbs are syntactically similar. They can be either transitive or intransitive, but differ in the semantic roles they assign to the subjects of intransitive sentences (undergoer and agent, respectively). To distinguish verbs presented in these two alternations, children must detect this difference in role assignments. We examined distributional features of the input as one possible source of information about this role difference. Experiment 1 showed that in a corpus of child-directed speech, causal and unspecified-object verbs differed in their patterns of intransitive-subject animacy and lexical overlap between nouns in subject and object positions. Experiment 2 tested children's ability to use these two distributional cues to infer the meaning of a novel causal or unspecified-object verb, by separating the presentation of a novel verb's distributional properties from its potential event referents. Children acquired useful combinatorial information about the novel verb simply by listening to its use in sentences, and later retrieved this information to map the verb to an appropriate event.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-803
Number of pages27
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2009

Fingerprint

Cues
Aptitude
Semantics
event
experiment
source of information
semantics
Transitivity
Verbs
interpretation
ability
Causal
Alternation
Intransitive

Keywords

  • Animacy
  • Distributional learning
  • Syntactic bootstrapping
  • Syntax
  • Verb learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs. / Scott, Rose M.; Fisher, Cynthia L.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 24, No. 6, 30.11.2009, p. 777-803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50d80047646c434bbb17f08cec38e326,
title = "Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs",
abstract = "Two-year-olds assign appropriate interpretations to verbs presented in two English transitivity alternations, the causal and unspecified-object alternations (Naigles, 1996). Here we explored how they might do so. Causal and unspecified-object verbs are syntactically similar. They can be either transitive or intransitive, but differ in the semantic roles they assign to the subjects of intransitive sentences (undergoer and agent, respectively). To distinguish verbs presented in these two alternations, children must detect this difference in role assignments. We examined distributional features of the input as one possible source of information about this role difference. Experiment 1 showed that in a corpus of child-directed speech, causal and unspecified-object verbs differed in their patterns of intransitive-subject animacy and lexical overlap between nouns in subject and object positions. Experiment 2 tested children's ability to use these two distributional cues to infer the meaning of a novel causal or unspecified-object verb, by separating the presentation of a novel verb's distributional properties from its potential event referents. Children acquired useful combinatorial information about the novel verb simply by listening to its use in sentences, and later retrieved this information to map the verb to an appropriate event.",
keywords = "Animacy, Distributional learning, Syntactic bootstrapping, Syntax, Verb learning",
author = "Scott, {Rose M.} and Fisher, {Cynthia L}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/01690960802573236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "777--803",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs

AU - Scott, Rose M.

AU - Fisher, Cynthia L

PY - 2009/11/30

Y1 - 2009/11/30

N2 - Two-year-olds assign appropriate interpretations to verbs presented in two English transitivity alternations, the causal and unspecified-object alternations (Naigles, 1996). Here we explored how they might do so. Causal and unspecified-object verbs are syntactically similar. They can be either transitive or intransitive, but differ in the semantic roles they assign to the subjects of intransitive sentences (undergoer and agent, respectively). To distinguish verbs presented in these two alternations, children must detect this difference in role assignments. We examined distributional features of the input as one possible source of information about this role difference. Experiment 1 showed that in a corpus of child-directed speech, causal and unspecified-object verbs differed in their patterns of intransitive-subject animacy and lexical overlap between nouns in subject and object positions. Experiment 2 tested children's ability to use these two distributional cues to infer the meaning of a novel causal or unspecified-object verb, by separating the presentation of a novel verb's distributional properties from its potential event referents. Children acquired useful combinatorial information about the novel verb simply by listening to its use in sentences, and later retrieved this information to map the verb to an appropriate event.

AB - Two-year-olds assign appropriate interpretations to verbs presented in two English transitivity alternations, the causal and unspecified-object alternations (Naigles, 1996). Here we explored how they might do so. Causal and unspecified-object verbs are syntactically similar. They can be either transitive or intransitive, but differ in the semantic roles they assign to the subjects of intransitive sentences (undergoer and agent, respectively). To distinguish verbs presented in these two alternations, children must detect this difference in role assignments. We examined distributional features of the input as one possible source of information about this role difference. Experiment 1 showed that in a corpus of child-directed speech, causal and unspecified-object verbs differed in their patterns of intransitive-subject animacy and lexical overlap between nouns in subject and object positions. Experiment 2 tested children's ability to use these two distributional cues to infer the meaning of a novel causal or unspecified-object verb, by separating the presentation of a novel verb's distributional properties from its potential event referents. Children acquired useful combinatorial information about the novel verb simply by listening to its use in sentences, and later retrieved this information to map the verb to an appropriate event.

KW - Animacy

KW - Distributional learning

KW - Syntactic bootstrapping

KW - Syntax

KW - Verb learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70450263388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70450263388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690960802573236

DO - 10.1080/01690960802573236

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 777

EP - 803

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 6

ER -