Two Approaches for tomographic density imaging using inverse scattering

Roberto J. Lavarello, Michael L. Oelze

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Most acoustic tomography methods neglect density in order to obtain speed of sound and attenuation . However, density may provide additional sources of contrast. In this work, two approaches for density imaging inverse scattering were explored through simulations in to evaluate the feasibility of density imaging. The first consisted of inverting the wave equation by solving for single functional that depended on both speed of sound and variations. Density profiles were separated by combining at two frequencies (DF-DBIM approach). The method consisted of solving for two functionals simultaneously: that depended only on compressibility and one that only on density variations. A T-matrix approach was to relate these functionals to the scattered data. The DFDBIM allowed separation of density and speed of sound at low termination tolerance values and less than an of magnitude between the largest and smallest frequencies . However, the convergence of DF-DBIM was compromised when moderate (around 2%) terminati n tolerances were.The T-matrix approach converged when multiple frequency was used, but required a ka product smaller than one the lowest frequency. The DF-DBIM requires a very high to obtain reliable quantitative density reconstructions, while T-matrix approach requires excessively large bandwidths imaging large targets. These limitations will serve as points for further algorithmic improvements required practical implementation of density imaging on ultrasound tomographic systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4803573
Pages (from-to)1298-1301
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008
Event2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2008 - Beijing, China
Duration: Nov 2 2008Nov 5 2008

Fingerprint

inverse scattering
deuterium fluorides
acoustics
functionals
matrices
wave equations
compressibility
tomography
attenuation
low frequencies
bandwidth
products
profiles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Two Approaches for tomographic density imaging using inverse scattering. / Lavarello, Roberto J.; Oelze, Michael L.

In: Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 01.12.2008, p. 1298-1301.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{84dc079a274848b5842d98e1e70d20da,
title = "Two Approaches for tomographic density imaging using inverse scattering",
abstract = "Most acoustic tomography methods neglect density in order to obtain speed of sound and attenuation . However, density may provide additional sources of contrast. In this work, two approaches for density imaging inverse scattering were explored through simulations in to evaluate the feasibility of density imaging. The first consisted of inverting the wave equation by solving for single functional that depended on both speed of sound and variations. Density profiles were separated by combining at two frequencies (DF-DBIM approach). The method consisted of solving for two functionals simultaneously: that depended only on compressibility and one that only on density variations. A T-matrix approach was to relate these functionals to the scattered data. The DFDBIM allowed separation of density and speed of sound at low termination tolerance values and less than an of magnitude between the largest and smallest frequencies . However, the convergence of DF-DBIM was compromised when moderate (around 2{\%}) terminati n tolerances were.The T-matrix approach converged when multiple frequency was used, but required a ka product smaller than one the lowest frequency. The DF-DBIM requires a very high to obtain reliable quantitative density reconstructions, while T-matrix approach requires excessively large bandwidths imaging large targets. These limitations will serve as points for further algorithmic improvements required practical implementation of density imaging on ultrasound tomographic systems.",
author = "Lavarello, {Roberto J.} and Oelze, {Michael L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0314",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1298--1301",
journal = "Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium",
issn = "1051-0117",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two Approaches for tomographic density imaging using inverse scattering

AU - Lavarello, Roberto J.

AU - Oelze, Michael L.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Most acoustic tomography methods neglect density in order to obtain speed of sound and attenuation . However, density may provide additional sources of contrast. In this work, two approaches for density imaging inverse scattering were explored through simulations in to evaluate the feasibility of density imaging. The first consisted of inverting the wave equation by solving for single functional that depended on both speed of sound and variations. Density profiles were separated by combining at two frequencies (DF-DBIM approach). The method consisted of solving for two functionals simultaneously: that depended only on compressibility and one that only on density variations. A T-matrix approach was to relate these functionals to the scattered data. The DFDBIM allowed separation of density and speed of sound at low termination tolerance values and less than an of magnitude between the largest and smallest frequencies . However, the convergence of DF-DBIM was compromised when moderate (around 2%) terminati n tolerances were.The T-matrix approach converged when multiple frequency was used, but required a ka product smaller than one the lowest frequency. The DF-DBIM requires a very high to obtain reliable quantitative density reconstructions, while T-matrix approach requires excessively large bandwidths imaging large targets. These limitations will serve as points for further algorithmic improvements required practical implementation of density imaging on ultrasound tomographic systems.

AB - Most acoustic tomography methods neglect density in order to obtain speed of sound and attenuation . However, density may provide additional sources of contrast. In this work, two approaches for density imaging inverse scattering were explored through simulations in to evaluate the feasibility of density imaging. The first consisted of inverting the wave equation by solving for single functional that depended on both speed of sound and variations. Density profiles were separated by combining at two frequencies (DF-DBIM approach). The method consisted of solving for two functionals simultaneously: that depended only on compressibility and one that only on density variations. A T-matrix approach was to relate these functionals to the scattered data. The DFDBIM allowed separation of density and speed of sound at low termination tolerance values and less than an of magnitude between the largest and smallest frequencies . However, the convergence of DF-DBIM was compromised when moderate (around 2%) terminati n tolerances were.The T-matrix approach converged when multiple frequency was used, but required a ka product smaller than one the lowest frequency. The DF-DBIM requires a very high to obtain reliable quantitative density reconstructions, while T-matrix approach requires excessively large bandwidths imaging large targets. These limitations will serve as points for further algorithmic improvements required practical implementation of density imaging on ultrasound tomographic systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649337319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649337319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0314

DO - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0314

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:67649337319

SP - 1298

EP - 1301

JO - Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

JF - Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

SN - 1051-0117

M1 - 4803573

ER -