Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources: Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations

Makoto Hayashi, Stephanie Hyeri Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intended as a contribution to our understanding of the principles underlying the selection of turn formats used for other-initiated repair (OIR), this study explores the relationship between OIR turn formats involving the "what" token in Japanese and Korean and the types of trouble addressed by them. We focus in particular on the differentiation between "open class repair initiators" (. Drew, 1997) and OIR that targets a specific referential element in the trouble-source turn. We show that, while prosody plays an important role in distinguishing the two in Korean, it does not in Japanese. Instead, Japanese speakers rely on grammatical resources, in particular postpositional particles, to accomplish the differentiation. We also discuss one type of OIR turn format in Japanese, nani ga ('what' followed by the nominative particle ga), whose workings deviate from those of all the other OIR turn formats consisting of "what" followed by a postpositional particle. We suggest that nani ga has undergone a process of pragmatic specialization and that, as a result, it is treated by speakers as an unanalyzed chunk used for specific pragmatic purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-217
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

pragmatics
Repair
conversation
specialization
resources
Other-initiated Repair
Particle

Keywords

  • Conversation analysis
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Other-initiated repair
  • Turn formats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources : Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations. / Hayashi, Makoto; Kim, Stephanie Hyeri.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 87, 01.10.2015, p. 198-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1924e7a9dc76469bb33ad92b95bee4c9,
title = "Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources: Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations",
abstract = "Intended as a contribution to our understanding of the principles underlying the selection of turn formats used for other-initiated repair (OIR), this study explores the relationship between OIR turn formats involving the {"}what{"} token in Japanese and Korean and the types of trouble addressed by them. We focus in particular on the differentiation between {"}open class repair initiators{"} (. Drew, 1997) and OIR that targets a specific referential element in the trouble-source turn. We show that, while prosody plays an important role in distinguishing the two in Korean, it does not in Japanese. Instead, Japanese speakers rely on grammatical resources, in particular postpositional particles, to accomplish the differentiation. We also discuss one type of OIR turn format in Japanese, nani ga ('what' followed by the nominative particle ga), whose workings deviate from those of all the other OIR turn formats consisting of {"}what{"} followed by a postpositional particle. We suggest that nani ga has undergone a process of pragmatic specialization and that, as a result, it is treated by speakers as an unanalyzed chunk used for specific pragmatic purposes.",
keywords = "Conversation analysis, Japanese, Korean, Other-initiated repair, Turn formats",
author = "Makoto Hayashi and Kim, {Stephanie Hyeri}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "198--217",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources

T2 - Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations

AU - Hayashi, Makoto

AU - Kim, Stephanie Hyeri

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Intended as a contribution to our understanding of the principles underlying the selection of turn formats used for other-initiated repair (OIR), this study explores the relationship between OIR turn formats involving the "what" token in Japanese and Korean and the types of trouble addressed by them. We focus in particular on the differentiation between "open class repair initiators" (. Drew, 1997) and OIR that targets a specific referential element in the trouble-source turn. We show that, while prosody plays an important role in distinguishing the two in Korean, it does not in Japanese. Instead, Japanese speakers rely on grammatical resources, in particular postpositional particles, to accomplish the differentiation. We also discuss one type of OIR turn format in Japanese, nani ga ('what' followed by the nominative particle ga), whose workings deviate from those of all the other OIR turn formats consisting of "what" followed by a postpositional particle. We suggest that nani ga has undergone a process of pragmatic specialization and that, as a result, it is treated by speakers as an unanalyzed chunk used for specific pragmatic purposes.

AB - Intended as a contribution to our understanding of the principles underlying the selection of turn formats used for other-initiated repair (OIR), this study explores the relationship between OIR turn formats involving the "what" token in Japanese and Korean and the types of trouble addressed by them. We focus in particular on the differentiation between "open class repair initiators" (. Drew, 1997) and OIR that targets a specific referential element in the trouble-source turn. We show that, while prosody plays an important role in distinguishing the two in Korean, it does not in Japanese. Instead, Japanese speakers rely on grammatical resources, in particular postpositional particles, to accomplish the differentiation. We also discuss one type of OIR turn format in Japanese, nani ga ('what' followed by the nominative particle ga), whose workings deviate from those of all the other OIR turn formats consisting of "what" followed by a postpositional particle. We suggest that nani ga has undergone a process of pragmatic specialization and that, as a result, it is treated by speakers as an unanalyzed chunk used for specific pragmatic purposes.

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Japanese

KW - Korean

KW - Other-initiated repair

KW - Turn formats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942981370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942981370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942981370

VL - 87

SP - 198

EP - 217

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -