“Truth or consequences”: A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis

Katherine Cumings Mansfield, Anjale Devawn Welton, Margaret Grogan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

STEM education has received significant attention in the USA and is largely fueled by rhetoric suggesting the USA is losing its global competitive edge and that there is a lack of qualified workers available to fill growing STEM jobs. However, a counter discourse is emerging that questions the legitimacy of these claims. In response, we employed feminist critical policy analysis as both a theory and a method to further critique the STEM crisis discourse. We argue that the nature of the current discourse is misleading at worst and incomplete at best and show who is fueling the crisis discourse and who stands to win or lose as a result. We reveal how the crisis discourse draws attention away from the multi-layered complexity of the issue and surface what is missing in the discourse to re-center public attention on protracted problems that still need dismantling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1155-1182
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
Volume27
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

discourse
available workers
dismantling
rhetoric
legitimacy
lack
education

Keywords

  • Critical policy analysis
  • Feminist theory
  • Qualitative research methods
  • STEM
  • Women and girls in education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

“Truth or consequences” : A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis. / Mansfield, Katherine Cumings; Welton, Anjale Devawn; Grogan, Margaret.

In: International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 27, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 1155-1182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f7268a3e48142739a92d33f02e26166,
title = "“Truth or consequences”: A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis",
abstract = "STEM education has received significant attention in the USA and is largely fueled by rhetoric suggesting the USA is losing its global competitive edge and that there is a lack of qualified workers available to fill growing STEM jobs. However, a counter discourse is emerging that questions the legitimacy of these claims. In response, we employed feminist critical policy analysis as both a theory and a method to further critique the STEM crisis discourse. We argue that the nature of the current discourse is misleading at worst and incomplete at best and show who is fueling the crisis discourse and who stands to win or lose as a result. We reveal how the crisis discourse draws attention away from the multi-layered complexity of the issue and surface what is missing in the discourse to re-center public attention on protracted problems that still need dismantling.",
keywords = "Critical policy analysis, Feminist theory, Qualitative research methods, STEM, Women and girls in education",
author = "Mansfield, {Katherine Cumings} and Welton, {Anjale Devawn} and Margaret Grogan",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09518398.2014.916006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1155--1182",
journal = "International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education",
issn = "0951-8398",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Truth or consequences”

T2 - A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis

AU - Mansfield, Katherine Cumings

AU - Welton, Anjale Devawn

AU - Grogan, Margaret

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - STEM education has received significant attention in the USA and is largely fueled by rhetoric suggesting the USA is losing its global competitive edge and that there is a lack of qualified workers available to fill growing STEM jobs. However, a counter discourse is emerging that questions the legitimacy of these claims. In response, we employed feminist critical policy analysis as both a theory and a method to further critique the STEM crisis discourse. We argue that the nature of the current discourse is misleading at worst and incomplete at best and show who is fueling the crisis discourse and who stands to win or lose as a result. We reveal how the crisis discourse draws attention away from the multi-layered complexity of the issue and surface what is missing in the discourse to re-center public attention on protracted problems that still need dismantling.

AB - STEM education has received significant attention in the USA and is largely fueled by rhetoric suggesting the USA is losing its global competitive edge and that there is a lack of qualified workers available to fill growing STEM jobs. However, a counter discourse is emerging that questions the legitimacy of these claims. In response, we employed feminist critical policy analysis as both a theory and a method to further critique the STEM crisis discourse. We argue that the nature of the current discourse is misleading at worst and incomplete at best and show who is fueling the crisis discourse and who stands to win or lose as a result. We reveal how the crisis discourse draws attention away from the multi-layered complexity of the issue and surface what is missing in the discourse to re-center public attention on protracted problems that still need dismantling.

KW - Critical policy analysis

KW - Feminist theory

KW - Qualitative research methods

KW - STEM

KW - Women and girls in education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988001554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988001554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09518398.2014.916006

DO - 10.1080/09518398.2014.916006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988001554

VL - 27

SP - 1155

EP - 1182

JO - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

JF - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

SN - 0951-8398

IS - 9

ER -