TY - JOUR
T1 - Trunk repositioning errors are increased in balance-impaired older adults
AU - Goldberg, Allon
AU - Hernandez, Manuel Enrique
AU - Alexander, Neil B.
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge support of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Grant AG08808 (University of Michigan Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center), NIA Grant AG10542, NIA Institutional Training Grant T32 AG00114 (Multidisciplinary Research Training in Aging), as well as the Office of Research and Development, Medical Service and Rehabilitation Research and the Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Alexander is a recipient of the K24 Mid-Career Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (AG 109675) from the NIA. Dr. Goldberg is the recipient of the 2004 Fellowship for Geriatric Research Award from the Section on Geriatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - Background. Controlling the flexing trunk is critical in recovering from a loss of balance and avoiding a fall. To investigate the relationship between trunk control and balance in older adults, we measured trunk repositioning accuracy in young and balance-impaired and unimpaired older adults. Methods. Young adults (N = 8, mean age 24.3 years) and two groups of community-dwelling older adults defined by unipedal stance time (UST)-a balance-unimpaired group (UST > 30 seconds, N = 7, mean age 73.9 years) and a balance-impaired group (UST < 5 seconds, N = 8, mean age 79.6 years)-were tested in standing trunk control ability by reproducing a ∼30° trunk flexion angle under three visual-surface conditions: eyes opened and closed on the floor, and eyes opened on foam. Errors in reproducing the angle were defined as trunk repositioning errors (TREs). Clinical measures related to balance, trunk extensor strength, and self-reported disability were obtained. Results. TREs were significantly greater in the balance-impaired group than in the other groups, even when controlling for trunk extensor strength and body mass. In older adults, there were significant correlations between TREs and three clinical measures of balance and fall risk, UST and maximum step length (-0.65 to -0.75), and Timed Up & Go score (0.55), and between TREs and age (0.63-0.76). In each group TREs were similar under the three visual-surface conditions. Test-retest reliability for TREs was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.74). Conclusions. Older balance-impaired adults have larger TREs, and thus poorer trunk control, than do balance-unimpaired older individuals. TREs are reliable and valid measures of underlying balance impairment in older adults, and may eventually prove to be useful in predicting the ability to recover from losses of balance and to avoid falls.
AB - Background. Controlling the flexing trunk is critical in recovering from a loss of balance and avoiding a fall. To investigate the relationship between trunk control and balance in older adults, we measured trunk repositioning accuracy in young and balance-impaired and unimpaired older adults. Methods. Young adults (N = 8, mean age 24.3 years) and two groups of community-dwelling older adults defined by unipedal stance time (UST)-a balance-unimpaired group (UST > 30 seconds, N = 7, mean age 73.9 years) and a balance-impaired group (UST < 5 seconds, N = 8, mean age 79.6 years)-were tested in standing trunk control ability by reproducing a ∼30° trunk flexion angle under three visual-surface conditions: eyes opened and closed on the floor, and eyes opened on foam. Errors in reproducing the angle were defined as trunk repositioning errors (TREs). Clinical measures related to balance, trunk extensor strength, and self-reported disability were obtained. Results. TREs were significantly greater in the balance-impaired group than in the other groups, even when controlling for trunk extensor strength and body mass. In older adults, there were significant correlations between TREs and three clinical measures of balance and fall risk, UST and maximum step length (-0.65 to -0.75), and Timed Up & Go score (0.55), and between TREs and age (0.63-0.76). In each group TREs were similar under the three visual-surface conditions. Test-retest reliability for TREs was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.74). Conclusions. Older balance-impaired adults have larger TREs, and thus poorer trunk control, than do balance-unimpaired older individuals. TREs are reliable and valid measures of underlying balance impairment in older adults, and may eventually prove to be useful in predicting the ability to recover from losses of balance and to avoid falls.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744532629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744532629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/gerona/60.10.1310
DO - 10.1093/gerona/60.10.1310
M3 - Article
C2 - 16282565
AN - SCOPUS:27744532629
VL - 60
SP - 1310
EP - 1314
JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
SN - 1079-5006
IS - 10
ER -