TY - JOUR
T1 - Truncation and angular-scattering corrections for absorbing aerosol in the TSI 3563 nephelometer
AU - Bond, Tami C.
AU - Covert, David S.
AU - Muller, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank John Ogren and Tad Anderson for useful comments. This work was supported by the United States National Science Foundation’s Atmospheric Chemistry Program under grants ATM-0349292 (TCB) and ATM-0337853 (DSC).
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - The nephelometer, the primary instrument used for accurate in-situ scattering measurements, suffers from small errors due to truncation and angular nonidealities in the light source. Because that error depends on particle size, it has been traditionally estimated from the wavelength dependence of scattering, which also depends on particle size. Absorption by particles alters the scattering wavelength dependence, so the traditional correction is in error by 1-5% for absorbing particles, particularly when that absorption is wavelength-dependent. Single-scattering albedos under 0.9 and absorption ngstrom exponents above 2 can have errors of over 2%. This problem will occur only very near sources, including laboratory measurements of combustion aerosol. For these situations, we suggest the correction should be calculated using Mie theory and an assumed refractive index, resulting in less than a 2% error. Scattering wavelength dependence for absorbing particles should not be used as a measurement of particle size.
AB - The nephelometer, the primary instrument used for accurate in-situ scattering measurements, suffers from small errors due to truncation and angular nonidealities in the light source. Because that error depends on particle size, it has been traditionally estimated from the wavelength dependence of scattering, which also depends on particle size. Absorption by particles alters the scattering wavelength dependence, so the traditional correction is in error by 1-5% for absorbing particles, particularly when that absorption is wavelength-dependent. Single-scattering albedos under 0.9 and absorption ngstrom exponents above 2 can have errors of over 2%. This problem will occur only very near sources, including laboratory measurements of combustion aerosol. For these situations, we suggest the correction should be calculated using Mie theory and an assumed refractive index, resulting in less than a 2% error. Scattering wavelength dependence for absorbing particles should not be used as a measurement of particle size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651174519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651174519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02786820902998373
DO - 10.1080/02786820902998373
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67651174519
SN - 0278-6826
VL - 43
SP - 866
EP - 871
JO - Aerosol Science and Technology
JF - Aerosol Science and Technology
IS - 9
ER -