TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in nonoperative treatment modalities prior to cervical surgery and impact on patient-derived outcomes
T2 - Two-year analysis of 1522 patients from the prospective spine treatment outcome study
AU - Gerling, Michael C.
AU - Radcliff, Kris
AU - Isaacs, Robert
AU - Bianco, Kristina
AU - Jalai, Cyrus M.
AU - Worley, Nancy J.
AU - Poorman, Gregory W.
AU - Horn, Samantha R.
AU - Bono, Olivia J.
AU - Moon, John
AU - Arnold, Paul M.
AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.
AU - Passias, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: Effects of nonoperative treatments on surgical outcomes for patients who failed conservative management for cervical spine pathologies remain unknown. The objective is to describe conservative modality use in patients indicated for surgery for degenerative cervical spine conditions and its impact on perioperative outcomes. Methods: The current study comprises a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. A total of 1522 patients with 1-to 2-level degenerative cervical pathology who were undergoing surgical intervention were included. Outcome measures used were health-related quality-of-life scores, length of hospitalization, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, and return-to-work status at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were grouped by diagnosis (radiculopathy vs. myelopathy), then divided based on epidural injection(s), physical therapy (PT), or opioid use prior to enrollment. Univariate t-tests and χ2 tests were performed to determine differences between groups and impact on outcomes. Results: Among 1319 radiculopathy patients, 25.7% received preoperative epidural injections, 35.3% received PT, and 35.5% received opioids. Radiculopathy patients who received epidurals and PT had higher 1-year postoperative returnto- work rates (P <.05). Radiculopathy patients without preoperative PT had longer hospitalization times, whereas those who received PT had higher 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning and physical component scores, lower 2-year visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm pain scores, and higher 2-year return-to-work incidence (P <.05). Of myelopathy patients (n = 203), 14.8% received epidural injections, 25.1% received opioids, and 41.5% received PT. Myelopathy patients with preoperative PT had worse VAS arm pain scores 2 years postoperatively (P <.05). Patients receiving opioids were younger and had greater baseline-2-year Neck Disability Index improvement (P <.05). Conclusions: Radiculopathy patients receiving epidurals returned to work after 1 year more frequently. PT was associated with shorter hospitalizations, greater SF-36 bodily pain normand physical component score improvements, and increased return-to-work rates after 1 and 2 years. No statistically significant nonoperative treatment was associated with return-to-work rate in myelopathy patients. Clinical Relevance: These findings suggest certain preoperative conservative treatment modalities are associated with improved outcomes in radiculopathy patients.
AB - Background: Effects of nonoperative treatments on surgical outcomes for patients who failed conservative management for cervical spine pathologies remain unknown. The objective is to describe conservative modality use in patients indicated for surgery for degenerative cervical spine conditions and its impact on perioperative outcomes. Methods: The current study comprises a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. A total of 1522 patients with 1-to 2-level degenerative cervical pathology who were undergoing surgical intervention were included. Outcome measures used were health-related quality-of-life scores, length of hospitalization, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, and return-to-work status at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were grouped by diagnosis (radiculopathy vs. myelopathy), then divided based on epidural injection(s), physical therapy (PT), or opioid use prior to enrollment. Univariate t-tests and χ2 tests were performed to determine differences between groups and impact on outcomes. Results: Among 1319 radiculopathy patients, 25.7% received preoperative epidural injections, 35.3% received PT, and 35.5% received opioids. Radiculopathy patients who received epidurals and PT had higher 1-year postoperative returnto- work rates (P <.05). Radiculopathy patients without preoperative PT had longer hospitalization times, whereas those who received PT had higher 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning and physical component scores, lower 2-year visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm pain scores, and higher 2-year return-to-work incidence (P <.05). Of myelopathy patients (n = 203), 14.8% received epidural injections, 25.1% received opioids, and 41.5% received PT. Myelopathy patients with preoperative PT had worse VAS arm pain scores 2 years postoperatively (P <.05). Patients receiving opioids were younger and had greater baseline-2-year Neck Disability Index improvement (P <.05). Conclusions: Radiculopathy patients receiving epidurals returned to work after 1 year more frequently. PT was associated with shorter hospitalizations, greater SF-36 bodily pain normand physical component score improvements, and increased return-to-work rates after 1 and 2 years. No statistically significant nonoperative treatment was associated with return-to-work rate in myelopathy patients. Clinical Relevance: These findings suggest certain preoperative conservative treatment modalities are associated with improved outcomes in radiculopathy patients.
KW - Cervical spine surgery
KW - Epidural injections
KW - Nonoperative treatment
KW - Opioids
KW - Outcomes
KW - Physical therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051456126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051456126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14444/5031
DO - 10.14444/5031
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051456126
SN - 2211-4599
VL - 12
SP - 250
EP - 259
JO - International Journal of Spine Surgery
JF - International Journal of Spine Surgery
IS - 2
ER -