TY - JOUR
T1 - Translocating ratsnakes
T2 - Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity?
AU - Degregorio, Brett A.
AU - Sperry, Jinelle H.
AU - Tuberville, Tracey D.
AU - Weatherhead, Patrick J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided to the University of Illinois by the US Army Corps of Engineers: ERDC–CERL. We thank Tim Hayden for assistance in securing funding. Support for TDT and access to the animal facilities and field site were made possible by the Department of Energy under Aware Number DE-FC09-07SR22506 to the University of Georgia Research Foundation. Thanks go to Alex Jones, Sam Dean and Erin Cork for excellent field and husbandry assistance. Caitlin Kupar, Nicole White and Bess Harris also provided valuable husbandry assistance. Special thanks go to Sean Poppy, J. Whitfield Gibbons, Angela Tucker and Berkeley Boone for access to captive ratsnakes. This study would not have been possible without all the help from people who looked for and brought us snakes, including I. Lehr Brisbin, Maureen McClintock, Chelsea Weithmann, Rich Biemiller, Wes Flynn, Zak Smith, Mike Epperly and Lincoln Adams. We appreciate the surgery and health inspections provided by Dr Jason Norman and his staff at the Hammond Hills Veterinary Hospital. All work was conducted under Illinois IACUC protocol number 14030 and University of Georgia IACUC #A2013 04-030-Y3-A4. Animals collected for this study were collected in accordance with permits #23-2012A, 39-2013, and 04-2014 from South Carolina Department of Natural Resources.
Publisher Copyright:
© CSIRO 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9%) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3%) resident snakes and none of five (0%) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86%) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30%). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.
AB - Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9%) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3%) resident snakes and none of five (0%) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86%) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30%). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.
KW - Animal behaviour
KW - Pantherophis obsoletus
KW - conservation
KW - environmental enrichment
KW - survivorship
KW - translocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032219435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032219435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/WR17016
DO - 10.1071/WR17016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032219435
SN - 1035-3712
VL - 44
SP - 438
EP - 448
JO - Wildlife Research
JF - Wildlife Research
IS - 5
ER -