Translocating ratsnakes: Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity?

Brett A. Degregorio, Jinelle H. Sperry, Tracey D. Tuberville, Patrick J Weatherhead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9%) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3%) resident snakes and none of five (0%) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86%) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30%). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-448
Number of pages11
JournalWildlife Research
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

captivity
snake
snakes
environmental enrichment
concealment behavior
translocation
vulnerability
effect
Elaphe obsoleta
predator
predators
captive animals
animal
wildlife
weight loss
foraging

Keywords

  • Animal behaviour
  • Pantherophis obsoletus
  • conservation
  • environmental enrichment
  • survivorship
  • translocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Translocating ratsnakes : Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity? / Degregorio, Brett A.; Sperry, Jinelle H.; Tuberville, Tracey D.; Weatherhead, Patrick J.

In: Wildlife Research, Vol. 44, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 438-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Degregorio, Brett A. ; Sperry, Jinelle H. ; Tuberville, Tracey D. ; Weatherhead, Patrick J. / Translocating ratsnakes : Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity?. In: Wildlife Research. 2017 ; Vol. 44, No. 5. pp. 438-448.
@article{090641047ca5477e87be595ade67719e,
title = "Translocating ratsnakes: Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity?",
abstract = "Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9{\%}) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3{\%}) resident snakes and none of five (0{\%}) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86{\%}) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30{\%}). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.",
keywords = "Animal behaviour, Pantherophis obsoletus, conservation, environmental enrichment, survivorship, translocation",
author = "Degregorio, {Brett A.} and Sperry, {Jinelle H.} and Tuberville, {Tracey D.} and Weatherhead, {Patrick J}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1071/WR17016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "438--448",
journal = "Wildlife Research",
issn = "1035-3712",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translocating ratsnakes

T2 - Does enrichment offset negative effects of time in captivity?

AU - Degregorio, Brett A.

AU - Sperry, Jinelle H.

AU - Tuberville, Tracey D.

AU - Weatherhead, Patrick J

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9%) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3%) resident snakes and none of five (0%) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86%) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30%). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.

AB - Context Wildlife translocation is a conservation tool with mixed success. Evidence suggests that longer time in captivity may negatively affect an animal's post-release behaviour and survival. However, environmental enrichment may reduce the deleterious effects of captivity for animals that are going to be released into the wild. Aims The aim of the present study was to compare first-year post-release survival and behaviour of translocated ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus) held captive for varying durations (1-7 years) either with or without enrichment, with that of resident and wild-to-wild (W-W)-translocated ratsnakes. Key results Being in captivity before release negatively affected survival; 11 of 19 (57.9%) captive snakes died or were removed from the study within 12 months, compared with 3 of 11 (27.3%) resident snakes and none of five (0%) W-W snakes. Furthermore, survival probability declined the longer a snake had been in captivity. Six of the seven snakes (86%) that we released that had been in captivity for four or more years before release died during this study, regardless of whether they were enriched or not. Although W-W-translocated ratsnakes moved more often and further than did snakes in other groups, this difference was apparent only in the first month post-release. We found no evidence that abnormal movement patterns or winter behaviour was the cause of reduced survival for captive snakes. Instead, our data suggested that spending time in captivity reduced concealment behaviour of snakes, which likely increased the vulnerability of snakes to predators. Captivity also compromised the foraging ability of some of the snakes. Although there were no overall differences in percentage weight change among the four groups, two snakes (one enriched, one unenriched) were removed from the study because of extreme weight loss (>30%). Conclusions Our results suggested that environmental enrichment did not offset the negative effects of captivity on ratsnakes and that the likely mechanism responsible for low survival was vulnerability to predators. Implications Whether extended periods in captivity render other species unsuitable for translocation, how long it takes for captivity to have deleterious effects, and whether environmental enrichment is also ineffective at offsetting captivity effects in other species remain to be determined.

KW - Animal behaviour

KW - Pantherophis obsoletus

KW - conservation

KW - environmental enrichment

KW - survivorship

KW - translocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032219435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032219435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/WR17016

DO - 10.1071/WR17016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032219435

VL - 44

SP - 438

EP - 448

JO - Wildlife Research

JF - Wildlife Research

SN - 1035-3712

IS - 5

ER -