Trademarks as search-engine keywords: Who, what, when?

David A. Hyman, David J. Franklyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Most Internet searches result in unpaid (organic or algorithmic) results, and paid ads. The specific ads that are displayed are dictated by the user's search terms ("keywords"). In 2004, Google began offering trademarks for use as keywords on an unrestricted basis, followed in due course by other search engines. Once that happened, any entity (including sellers of competing products) could have their ads appear in response to a search for the trademarked product. Trademark owners responded by filing more than 100 lawsuits in the United States and Europe, making the dispute the hottest controversy in the history of trademark law. Litigation has focused on purchases by competitors-giving the impression that competitors account for a large portion of such purchases. We find that competitors account for a relatively small percentage of keyword purchases, and many trademark owners purchase their own marks as keywords. We also find a high degree of fluctuation in the number of paid ads and the domain names to which those ads are linked. We conclude that the risk of widespread abuse is low. Trademark owners' objections seem to have more to do with objections to free riding than with the zone of interests currently protected by U.S. trademark law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2117-2150
Number of pages34
JournalTexas Law Review
Volume92
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trademarks as search-engine keywords: Who, what, when?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this