TY - UNPB
T1 - Tracking Species Recovery Status to Improve Endangered Species Act Decisions
AU - Li, Ya-Wei
AU - Molano-Flores, Brenda
AU - Davis, Olivia
AU - Allen, Maximillian
AU - Davis, Mark
AU - Mengelkoch, Jean M.
AU - Parkos, III, Joseph J
AU - Porreca, Anthony Paul
AU - Fournier, Auriel M. V.
AU - Stodola, Alison P.
AU - Tiemann, Jeremy
AU - Bried, Jason
AU - Marcum, Paul B.
AU - Carroll-Cunningham, Connie J.
AU - Janssen, Eric D.
AU - Ulaszek, Eric F.
AU - McIntyre, Susan
AU - Jog, Suneeti
AU - Price, Edward P. F.
AU - Nieset, Julie
AU - Beveroth, Tara
AU - Giovanni, Alexander Di
AU - Askren, Ryan J.
AU - Malanchuk, Luke J.
AU - Duquette, Jared F.
AU - Dreslik, Michael Joseph
AU - Mcelrath, Thomas
AU - Taft, John B.
AU - Stodola, Kirk
AU - Malcom, Jacob
AU - Carter, Andrew Pearce
AU - Evansen, Meg
AU - Gerber, Leah
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) protects over 2,000 species, but no concise, standardized metrics exist for assessing changes in species recovery status. Tracking these changes is crucial to understanding species status, adjusting conservation strategies, and assessing the performance of the ESA. We helped develop and test novel metrics that track changes in recovery status using six components. ESA 5-year status reviews provided all of the information used to apply the recovery metrics. When we analyzed the reviews, we observed several key challenges to species recovery. First, the reviews lack a standardized format and clear documentation. Second, despite having been listed for decades, many species still lack basic information about their biology and threats. Third, many species have continued to decline after listing. Fourth, many species currently have no path to recovery. Applying the recovery metrics allowed us to gain these and other insights about ESA implementation. We urge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to adopt the metrics as part of future status reviews in order to inform public discourse on improving conservation policy and to systematically track the recovery progress of all ESA species.
AB - The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) protects over 2,000 species, but no concise, standardized metrics exist for assessing changes in species recovery status. Tracking these changes is crucial to understanding species status, adjusting conservation strategies, and assessing the performance of the ESA. We helped develop and test novel metrics that track changes in recovery status using six components. ESA 5-year status reviews provided all of the information used to apply the recovery metrics. When we analyzed the reviews, we observed several key challenges to species recovery. First, the reviews lack a standardized format and clear documentation. Second, despite having been listed for decades, many species still lack basic information about their biology and threats. Third, many species have continued to decline after listing. Fourth, many species currently have no path to recovery. Applying the recovery metrics allowed us to gain these and other insights about ESA implementation. We urge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to adopt the metrics as part of future status reviews in order to inform public discourse on improving conservation policy and to systematically track the recovery progress of all ESA species.
UR - https://osf.io/sznmq/
U2 - 10.31219/osf.io/sznmq
DO - 10.31219/osf.io/sznmq
M3 - Preprint
BT - Tracking Species Recovery Status to Improve Endangered Species Act Decisions
ER -