Towards a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions: What can we learn from agriculture and forest economics?

Kahlil Baker, Gary Q. Bull, Kathy Baylis, Richard Barichello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Academic research on smallholders' forestland-use decisions is regularly addressed in different streams of literature using different theoretical constructs that are independently incomplete. In this article, we propose a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions intended to serve in the guidance and operationalization of future models for quantitative analysis. Our construct is inspired by the sub-disciplines of forestry and agricultural economics with a crosscutting theme of how transaction costs drive separability between consumption and production decisions. Our results help explain why exogenous variables proposed in the existing literature are insufficient at explaining smallholders' forestland-use decisions, and provide theoretical context for endogenizing characteristics of the household, farm and landscape. Smallholders' forestland-use decisions are best understood in an agricultural context of competing uses for household assets and interdependent consumption and production decisions. Forest production strategies range from natural regeneration to intensive management of the forest resource to co-jointly produce market and non-market values. Due to transaction costs, decision prices are best represented by their shadow as opposed to market prices. Shadow prices are shaped by endogenous smallholder-specific preferences for leisure, non-market values, time, risk, and uncertainty. Our proposed construct is intended to provide a theoretical basis to assist modellers in the selection of variables for quantitative analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number345
JournalForests
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 14 2017

Fingerprint

forest economics
smallholder
agriculture
economics
modeling
quantitative analysis
households
shadow prices
transaction cost
agricultural economics
market prices
natural regeneration
forest resources
assets
timber production
uncertainty
academic research
markets
farms
forest resource

Keywords

  • Afforestation
  • International development
  • Modelling
  • Separability
  • Transaction costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry

Cite this

Towards a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions : What can we learn from agriculture and forest economics? / Baker, Kahlil; Bull, Gary Q.; Baylis, Kathy; Barichello, Richard.

In: Forests, Vol. 8, No. 9, 345, 14.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fa522a004da4e65893d20c7e06c1531,
title = "Towards a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions: What can we learn from agriculture and forest economics?",
abstract = "Academic research on smallholders' forestland-use decisions is regularly addressed in different streams of literature using different theoretical constructs that are independently incomplete. In this article, we propose a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions intended to serve in the guidance and operationalization of future models for quantitative analysis. Our construct is inspired by the sub-disciplines of forestry and agricultural economics with a crosscutting theme of how transaction costs drive separability between consumption and production decisions. Our results help explain why exogenous variables proposed in the existing literature are insufficient at explaining smallholders' forestland-use decisions, and provide theoretical context for endogenizing characteristics of the household, farm and landscape. Smallholders' forestland-use decisions are best understood in an agricultural context of competing uses for household assets and interdependent consumption and production decisions. Forest production strategies range from natural regeneration to intensive management of the forest resource to co-jointly produce market and non-market values. Due to transaction costs, decision prices are best represented by their shadow as opposed to market prices. Shadow prices are shaped by endogenous smallholder-specific preferences for leisure, non-market values, time, risk, and uncertainty. Our proposed construct is intended to provide a theoretical basis to assist modellers in the selection of variables for quantitative analysis.",
keywords = "Afforestation, International development, Modelling, Separability, Transaction costs",
author = "Kahlil Baker and Bull, {Gary Q.} and Kathy Baylis and Richard Barichello",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3390/f8090345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Forests",
issn = "1999-4907",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions

T2 - What can we learn from agriculture and forest economics?

AU - Baker, Kahlil

AU - Bull, Gary Q.

AU - Baylis, Kathy

AU - Barichello, Richard

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - Academic research on smallholders' forestland-use decisions is regularly addressed in different streams of literature using different theoretical constructs that are independently incomplete. In this article, we propose a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions intended to serve in the guidance and operationalization of future models for quantitative analysis. Our construct is inspired by the sub-disciplines of forestry and agricultural economics with a crosscutting theme of how transaction costs drive separability between consumption and production decisions. Our results help explain why exogenous variables proposed in the existing literature are insufficient at explaining smallholders' forestland-use decisions, and provide theoretical context for endogenizing characteristics of the household, farm and landscape. Smallholders' forestland-use decisions are best understood in an agricultural context of competing uses for household assets and interdependent consumption and production decisions. Forest production strategies range from natural regeneration to intensive management of the forest resource to co-jointly produce market and non-market values. Due to transaction costs, decision prices are best represented by their shadow as opposed to market prices. Shadow prices are shaped by endogenous smallholder-specific preferences for leisure, non-market values, time, risk, and uncertainty. Our proposed construct is intended to provide a theoretical basis to assist modellers in the selection of variables for quantitative analysis.

AB - Academic research on smallholders' forestland-use decisions is regularly addressed in different streams of literature using different theoretical constructs that are independently incomplete. In this article, we propose a theoretical construct for modelling smallholders' forestland-use decisions intended to serve in the guidance and operationalization of future models for quantitative analysis. Our construct is inspired by the sub-disciplines of forestry and agricultural economics with a crosscutting theme of how transaction costs drive separability between consumption and production decisions. Our results help explain why exogenous variables proposed in the existing literature are insufficient at explaining smallholders' forestland-use decisions, and provide theoretical context for endogenizing characteristics of the household, farm and landscape. Smallholders' forestland-use decisions are best understood in an agricultural context of competing uses for household assets and interdependent consumption and production decisions. Forest production strategies range from natural regeneration to intensive management of the forest resource to co-jointly produce market and non-market values. Due to transaction costs, decision prices are best represented by their shadow as opposed to market prices. Shadow prices are shaped by endogenous smallholder-specific preferences for leisure, non-market values, time, risk, and uncertainty. Our proposed construct is intended to provide a theoretical basis to assist modellers in the selection of variables for quantitative analysis.

KW - Afforestation

KW - International development

KW - Modelling

KW - Separability

KW - Transaction costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029764383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029764383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/f8090345

DO - 10.3390/f8090345

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029764383

VL - 8

JO - Forests

JF - Forests

SN - 1999-4907

IS - 9

M1 - 345

ER -