TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a Kantian theory of philosophical education and wisdom
T2 - With the help of Hannah Arendt
AU - Varden, Helga
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to David Bakhurst, Elvira Basevich, Mavis Biss, Lisa Chason, Sarah Clark Miller, Katerina Deligiorgi, Barbara Herman, Sarah Holtman, Huaping Lu-Adler, Jordan Pascoe, Susanne Sreedhar, Martin Sticker, Shelley Weinberg, Garrath Williams, Melissa Zinkin, Lorenzo Zucca, Rachel Zuckert and two anonymous reviewers for their generous engagement with this paper as it was developing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Kant's life shows us that it is possible to be a philosopher who revolutionises our thinking about morality in terms of freedom—in fact, to be the first to propose that treating others morally is to treat them with respect or as having dignity—while simultaneously dehumanising himself and others. It presumably follows from this that we can teach our students Kant's brilliant theories of morality as freedom without, thereby, giving them access to all the philosophical resources they need to become wise, good people. In fact, having access to philosophical education can make us unhappy, arrogant or alienated from ourselves, others and society. Helpful to remedying this problem in Kant's philosophy is to bring it into conversation with Hannah Arendt on the topics of human nature and philosophical education within the context of modern life. Together, their theories also bring to light sources of emotional challenges that make it more difficult to achieve wisdom. Indeed, I suggest, Kant's own failures at achieving wisdom are not accidentally related to these challenges—as are those of much ideal theory today.
AB - Kant's life shows us that it is possible to be a philosopher who revolutionises our thinking about morality in terms of freedom—in fact, to be the first to propose that treating others morally is to treat them with respect or as having dignity—while simultaneously dehumanising himself and others. It presumably follows from this that we can teach our students Kant's brilliant theories of morality as freedom without, thereby, giving them access to all the philosophical resources they need to become wise, good people. In fact, having access to philosophical education can make us unhappy, arrogant or alienated from ourselves, others and society. Helpful to remedying this problem in Kant's philosophy is to bring it into conversation with Hannah Arendt on the topics of human nature and philosophical education within the context of modern life. Together, their theories also bring to light sources of emotional challenges that make it more difficult to achieve wisdom. Indeed, I suggest, Kant's own failures at achieving wisdom are not accidentally related to these challenges—as are those of much ideal theory today.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121361372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121361372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9752.12621
DO - 10.1111/1467-9752.12621
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121361372
SN - 0309-8249
VL - 55
SP - 1081
EP - 1096
JO - Journal of Philosophy of Education
JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education
IS - 6
ER -