Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types

Jennifer Leeann Hardesty, Kimberly A. Crossman, Megan L. Haselschwerdt, Raffaelli Marcela, Brian Gabriel Ogolsky, Michael P. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Coercive control is central to distinguishing between Johnson's (2008) 2 main types of intimate partner violence: (a) coercive controlling violence and (b) situational couple violence. Approaches to assessing coercive control, however, have been inconsistent. Using data from 2 projects involving divorcing mothers (N = 190), the authors compared common analytic strategies for operationalizing coercive control and classifying types of violence. The results establish advantages to measuring coercive control in terms of frequency versus number of tactics, illustrate the use of both hierarchical and k-means clustering methods to identify patterns of coercive control and evaluate clustering solutions, and offer a suggested cutoff for classifying violence types in general samples of separated women using the Dominance-Isolation subscale of the widely used Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1992). Finally, the authors demonstrate associations between types of violence and theoretically relevant variables, including frequency and severity of violence, harassment and violence after separation, fear, and perceived threat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)833-843
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Marriage and Family
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

violence
maltreatment
tactics
social isolation
threat
anxiety

Keywords

  • Cluster analysis
  • Coercive control
  • Cutoff score
  • Divorce
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types. / Hardesty, Jennifer Leeann; Crossman, Kimberly A.; Haselschwerdt, Megan L.; Marcela, Raffaelli; Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel; Johnson, Michael P.

In: Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 77, No. 4, 01.08.2015, p. 833-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c05b318039344f0ca986d74e7e0d9ef9,
title = "Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types",
abstract = "Coercive control is central to distinguishing between Johnson's (2008) 2 main types of intimate partner violence: (a) coercive controlling violence and (b) situational couple violence. Approaches to assessing coercive control, however, have been inconsistent. Using data from 2 projects involving divorcing mothers (N = 190), the authors compared common analytic strategies for operationalizing coercive control and classifying types of violence. The results establish advantages to measuring coercive control in terms of frequency versus number of tactics, illustrate the use of both hierarchical and k-means clustering methods to identify patterns of coercive control and evaluate clustering solutions, and offer a suggested cutoff for classifying violence types in general samples of separated women using the Dominance-Isolation subscale of the widely used Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1992). Finally, the authors demonstrate associations between types of violence and theoretically relevant variables, including frequency and severity of violence, harassment and violence after separation, fear, and perceived threat.",
keywords = "Cluster analysis, Coercive control, Cutoff score, Divorce, Intimate partner violence, Measurement",
author = "Hardesty, {Jennifer Leeann} and Crossman, {Kimberly A.} and Haselschwerdt, {Megan L.} and Raffaelli Marcela and Ogolsky, {Brian Gabriel} and Johnson, {Michael P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jomf.12201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "833--843",
journal = "Journal of Marriage and Family",
issn = "0022-2445",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types

AU - Hardesty, Jennifer Leeann

AU - Crossman, Kimberly A.

AU - Haselschwerdt, Megan L.

AU - Marcela, Raffaelli

AU - Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel

AU - Johnson, Michael P.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Coercive control is central to distinguishing between Johnson's (2008) 2 main types of intimate partner violence: (a) coercive controlling violence and (b) situational couple violence. Approaches to assessing coercive control, however, have been inconsistent. Using data from 2 projects involving divorcing mothers (N = 190), the authors compared common analytic strategies for operationalizing coercive control and classifying types of violence. The results establish advantages to measuring coercive control in terms of frequency versus number of tactics, illustrate the use of both hierarchical and k-means clustering methods to identify patterns of coercive control and evaluate clustering solutions, and offer a suggested cutoff for classifying violence types in general samples of separated women using the Dominance-Isolation subscale of the widely used Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1992). Finally, the authors demonstrate associations between types of violence and theoretically relevant variables, including frequency and severity of violence, harassment and violence after separation, fear, and perceived threat.

AB - Coercive control is central to distinguishing between Johnson's (2008) 2 main types of intimate partner violence: (a) coercive controlling violence and (b) situational couple violence. Approaches to assessing coercive control, however, have been inconsistent. Using data from 2 projects involving divorcing mothers (N = 190), the authors compared common analytic strategies for operationalizing coercive control and classifying types of violence. The results establish advantages to measuring coercive control in terms of frequency versus number of tactics, illustrate the use of both hierarchical and k-means clustering methods to identify patterns of coercive control and evaluate clustering solutions, and offer a suggested cutoff for classifying violence types in general samples of separated women using the Dominance-Isolation subscale of the widely used Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1992). Finally, the authors demonstrate associations between types of violence and theoretically relevant variables, including frequency and severity of violence, harassment and violence after separation, fear, and perceived threat.

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Coercive control

KW - Cutoff score

KW - Divorce

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935699607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84935699607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jomf.12201

DO - 10.1111/jomf.12201

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 833

EP - 843

JO - Journal of Marriage and Family

JF - Journal of Marriage and Family

SN - 0022-2445

IS - 4

ER -