TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a Consensus Description of Vocal Effort, Vocal Load, Vocal Loading, and Vocal Fatigue
AU - Hunter, Eric J.
AU - Cantor-Cutiva, Lady Catherine
AU - van Leer, Eva
AU - van Mersbergen, Miriam
AU - Nanjundeswaran, Chaya Devie
AU - Bottalico, Pasquale
AU - Sandage, Mary J.
AU - Whitling, Susanna
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was in part supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award R01DC012315. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors would like to thank the following student research associates for their very valuable help in reading and discussing the articles reviewed in this work: Russell Banks, Mark Berardi, Rebecca Clawson, Brittany Johnson, and Salma Mart?nez.
Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was in part supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award R01DC012315. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent
PY - 2020/2/26
Y1 - 2020/2/26
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this document is threefold: (a) review the uses of the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” (as found in the literature) in order to track the occurrence and the related evolution of research; (b) present a “linguistically modeled” definition of the same from the review of literature on the terms; and (c) propose conceptualized definitions of the concepts. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. Four terms (“vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading”), as well as possible variants, were included in the search, and their usages were compiled into conceptual definitions. Finally, a focus group of eight experts in the field (current authors) worked together to make conceptual connections and proposed consensus definitions. Results: The occurrence and frequency of “vocal load,” “vocal loading,” “vocal effort,” and “vocal fatigue” in the literature are presented, and summary definitions are developed. The results indicate that these terms appear to be often interchanged with blurred distinctions. Therefore, the focus group proposes the use of two new terms, “vocal demand” and “vocal demand response,” in place of the terms “vocal load” and “vocal loading.” We also propose standardized definitions for all four concepts. Conclusion: Through a comprehensive literature search, the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” were explored, new terms were proposed, and standardized definitions were presented. Future work should refine these proposed definitions as research continues to address vocal health concerns.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this document is threefold: (a) review the uses of the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” (as found in the literature) in order to track the occurrence and the related evolution of research; (b) present a “linguistically modeled” definition of the same from the review of literature on the terms; and (c) propose conceptualized definitions of the concepts. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. Four terms (“vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading”), as well as possible variants, were included in the search, and their usages were compiled into conceptual definitions. Finally, a focus group of eight experts in the field (current authors) worked together to make conceptual connections and proposed consensus definitions. Results: The occurrence and frequency of “vocal load,” “vocal loading,” “vocal effort,” and “vocal fatigue” in the literature are presented, and summary definitions are developed. The results indicate that these terms appear to be often interchanged with blurred distinctions. Therefore, the focus group proposes the use of two new terms, “vocal demand” and “vocal demand response,” in place of the terms “vocal load” and “vocal loading.” We also propose standardized definitions for all four concepts. Conclusion: Through a comprehensive literature search, the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” were explored, new terms were proposed, and standardized definitions were presented. Future work should refine these proposed definitions as research continues to address vocal health concerns.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081166535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081166535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00057
DO - 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00057
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32078404
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 63
SP - 509
EP - 532
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 2
ER -