Abstract

Significance: Advances in label-free imaging have impacted many areas of biological and biomedical imaging ranging from cell biology and cancer to pathology and neuroscience. Despite the great progress and advantages of these methods, it is clear that to realize their full potential, validation by extrinsic labels and probes is critically needed. Aim: This perspective calls for developing and applying innovative labels and probes to validate both existing and emerging label-free imaging methods. Approach: Major representative types of label-free imaging methods are briefly presented discussing their advantages and differing contrasts. Their biological applications are also reviewed with a focus on how validation of label-free methods with carefully developed labeling approaches will greatly aid in further intrinsic contrast imaging adoption and likely lead to more sophisticated image-based biomarkers and a better understanding of the underlying signals. Conclusions: Expanded efforts in extrinsic label validation will significantly push forward the utilization and adoption of label-free methods both in basic research and clinical models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS22717
JournalJournal of biomedical optics
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2024

Keywords

  • autofluorescence
  • intrinsic contrast
  • label-free imaging
  • probes
  • validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To label or not: The need for validation in label-free imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this