Timed action and object naming

Anna Szekely, Simonetta D'Amico, Antonella Devescovi, Kara D Federmeier, Dan Herron, Gowri Iyer, Thomas Jacobsen, Analía L. Arévalo, Andras Vargha, Elizabeth Bates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Factors affecting object and action naming were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm, for drawings of 520 objects and 275 actions, named by adult native speakers of English. Massive differences between object and action naming were observed for all dependent variables, and theoretically relevant differences emerged in the variables that predict retrieval of nouns vs. verbs in this task. Matching object and action items for variables like frequency, age of acquisition, or picture complexity does not result in a match for measures of naming difficulty (name agreement or latency). Conversely, object and action items matched for naming difficulty invariably differ in their other lexical and pictorial properties. A reaction time disadvantage for action naming remains even after controlling for picture properties, target word properties, name agreement itself (reflecting the differential ambiguity of nouns and verbs) as well as a measure of conceptual or psychological complexity based on the number of relevant objects in the scene. Surprisingly, frequency effects run in opposite directions for nouns (higher frequencies yield faster RTs) and verbs (higher frequencies are associated with slower RTs, reflecting a " light verb" strategy that speakers use for difficult items). Implications for method and theory in the study of lexical access are discussed, including relevance to a growing literature on the neurobiology and development of nouns and verbs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-25
Number of pages19
JournalCortex
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Names
Neurobiology
Population Groups
Reaction Time
Psychology
Light
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Action
  • Name agreement
  • Nonus
  • Object
  • Picture naming
  • Response times
  • Verbs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Szekely, A., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K. D., Herron, D., Iyer, G., ... Bates, E. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6

Timed action and object naming. / Szekely, Anna; D'Amico, Simonetta; Devescovi, Antonella; Federmeier, Kara D; Herron, Dan; Iyer, Gowri; Jacobsen, Thomas; Arévalo, Analía L.; Vargha, Andras; Bates, Elizabeth.

In: Cortex, Vol. 41, No. 1, 02.2005, p. 7-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szekely, A, D'Amico, S, Devescovi, A, Federmeier, KD, Herron, D, Iyer, G, Jacobsen, T, Arévalo, AL, Vargha, A & Bates, E 2005, 'Timed action and object naming', Cortex, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6
Szekely A, D'Amico S, Devescovi A, Federmeier KD, Herron D, Iyer G et al. Timed action and object naming. Cortex. 2005 Feb;41(1):7-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6
Szekely, Anna ; D'Amico, Simonetta ; Devescovi, Antonella ; Federmeier, Kara D ; Herron, Dan ; Iyer, Gowri ; Jacobsen, Thomas ; Arévalo, Analía L. ; Vargha, Andras ; Bates, Elizabeth. / Timed action and object naming. In: Cortex. 2005 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 7-25.
@article{0993a53d5cba4c73bae5ef8f348a0f62,
title = "Timed action and object naming",
abstract = "Factors affecting object and action naming were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm, for drawings of 520 objects and 275 actions, named by adult native speakers of English. Massive differences between object and action naming were observed for all dependent variables, and theoretically relevant differences emerged in the variables that predict retrieval of nouns vs. verbs in this task. Matching object and action items for variables like frequency, age of acquisition, or picture complexity does not result in a match for measures of naming difficulty (name agreement or latency). Conversely, object and action items matched for naming difficulty invariably differ in their other lexical and pictorial properties. A reaction time disadvantage for action naming remains even after controlling for picture properties, target word properties, name agreement itself (reflecting the differential ambiguity of nouns and verbs) as well as a measure of conceptual or psychological complexity based on the number of relevant objects in the scene. Surprisingly, frequency effects run in opposite directions for nouns (higher frequencies yield faster RTs) and verbs (higher frequencies are associated with slower RTs, reflecting a {"} light verb{"} strategy that speakers use for difficult items). Implications for method and theory in the study of lexical access are discussed, including relevance to a growing literature on the neurobiology and development of nouns and verbs.",
keywords = "Action, Name agreement, Nonus, Object, Picture naming, Response times, Verbs",
author = "Anna Szekely and Simonetta D'Amico and Antonella Devescovi and Federmeier, {Kara D} and Dan Herron and Gowri Iyer and Thomas Jacobsen and Ar{\'e}valo, {Anal{\'i}a L.} and Andras Vargha and Elizabeth Bates",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "7--25",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timed action and object naming

AU - Szekely, Anna

AU - D'Amico, Simonetta

AU - Devescovi, Antonella

AU - Federmeier, Kara D

AU - Herron, Dan

AU - Iyer, Gowri

AU - Jacobsen, Thomas

AU - Arévalo, Analía L.

AU - Vargha, Andras

AU - Bates, Elizabeth

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Factors affecting object and action naming were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm, for drawings of 520 objects and 275 actions, named by adult native speakers of English. Massive differences between object and action naming were observed for all dependent variables, and theoretically relevant differences emerged in the variables that predict retrieval of nouns vs. verbs in this task. Matching object and action items for variables like frequency, age of acquisition, or picture complexity does not result in a match for measures of naming difficulty (name agreement or latency). Conversely, object and action items matched for naming difficulty invariably differ in their other lexical and pictorial properties. A reaction time disadvantage for action naming remains even after controlling for picture properties, target word properties, name agreement itself (reflecting the differential ambiguity of nouns and verbs) as well as a measure of conceptual or psychological complexity based on the number of relevant objects in the scene. Surprisingly, frequency effects run in opposite directions for nouns (higher frequencies yield faster RTs) and verbs (higher frequencies are associated with slower RTs, reflecting a " light verb" strategy that speakers use for difficult items). Implications for method and theory in the study of lexical access are discussed, including relevance to a growing literature on the neurobiology and development of nouns and verbs.

AB - Factors affecting object and action naming were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm, for drawings of 520 objects and 275 actions, named by adult native speakers of English. Massive differences between object and action naming were observed for all dependent variables, and theoretically relevant differences emerged in the variables that predict retrieval of nouns vs. verbs in this task. Matching object and action items for variables like frequency, age of acquisition, or picture complexity does not result in a match for measures of naming difficulty (name agreement or latency). Conversely, object and action items matched for naming difficulty invariably differ in their other lexical and pictorial properties. A reaction time disadvantage for action naming remains even after controlling for picture properties, target word properties, name agreement itself (reflecting the differential ambiguity of nouns and verbs) as well as a measure of conceptual or psychological complexity based on the number of relevant objects in the scene. Surprisingly, frequency effects run in opposite directions for nouns (higher frequencies yield faster RTs) and verbs (higher frequencies are associated with slower RTs, reflecting a " light verb" strategy that speakers use for difficult items). Implications for method and theory in the study of lexical access are discussed, including relevance to a growing literature on the neurobiology and development of nouns and verbs.

KW - Action

KW - Name agreement

KW - Nonus

KW - Object

KW - Picture naming

KW - Response times

KW - Verbs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044297003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044297003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6

DO - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 15633703

AN - SCOPUS:10044297003

VL - 41

SP - 7

EP - 25

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 1

ER -