This Is What a Dictionary Looks Like: The Lexicographical Contributions of Feminist Dictionaries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Feminist dictionaries published between 1970 and 2006 have received little attention in the world of lexicography. The aim of this article is to establish feminist dictionaries as ambitious revisions of lexicographical theory and practice worthy of historical documentation and contemporary consideration. Feminist dictionaries are shown to propose a form of lexicography that (1) foregrounds the material and personal circumstances of dictionary production, (2) fosters active, opinionated, and exploratory dictionary consumption, and (3) highlights meaning as contextual, contested, personal, and perspectival. This article suggests that remembering and reviving the lexicographical priorities of feminist dictionaries is valuable for telling the history and imagining the future of the dictionary genre.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Journal of Lexicography
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dictionary
Lexicography
Imagining
Documentation
History
Contextual
Remembering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{8de3f0ed43ca4fee87867869b43167c0,
title = "This Is What a Dictionary Looks Like: The Lexicographical Contributions of Feminist Dictionaries",
abstract = "Feminist dictionaries published between 1970 and 2006 have received little attention in the world of lexicography. The aim of this article is to establish feminist dictionaries as ambitious revisions of lexicographical theory and practice worthy of historical documentation and contemporary consideration. Feminist dictionaries are shown to propose a form of lexicography that (1) foregrounds the material and personal circumstances of dictionary production, (2) fosters active, opinionated, and exploratory dictionary consumption, and (3) highlights meaning as contextual, contested, personal, and perspectival. This article suggests that remembering and reviving the lexicographical priorities of feminist dictionaries is valuable for telling the history and imagining the future of the dictionary genre.",
author = "Russell, {Lindsay Rose}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ijl/ecr013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "International Journal of Lexicography",
issn = "0950-3846",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - This Is What a Dictionary Looks Like

T2 - The Lexicographical Contributions of Feminist Dictionaries

AU - Russell, Lindsay Rose

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Feminist dictionaries published between 1970 and 2006 have received little attention in the world of lexicography. The aim of this article is to establish feminist dictionaries as ambitious revisions of lexicographical theory and practice worthy of historical documentation and contemporary consideration. Feminist dictionaries are shown to propose a form of lexicography that (1) foregrounds the material and personal circumstances of dictionary production, (2) fosters active, opinionated, and exploratory dictionary consumption, and (3) highlights meaning as contextual, contested, personal, and perspectival. This article suggests that remembering and reviving the lexicographical priorities of feminist dictionaries is valuable for telling the history and imagining the future of the dictionary genre.

AB - Feminist dictionaries published between 1970 and 2006 have received little attention in the world of lexicography. The aim of this article is to establish feminist dictionaries as ambitious revisions of lexicographical theory and practice worthy of historical documentation and contemporary consideration. Feminist dictionaries are shown to propose a form of lexicography that (1) foregrounds the material and personal circumstances of dictionary production, (2) fosters active, opinionated, and exploratory dictionary consumption, and (3) highlights meaning as contextual, contested, personal, and perspectival. This article suggests that remembering and reviving the lexicographical priorities of feminist dictionaries is valuable for telling the history and imagining the future of the dictionary genre.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858225382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858225382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijl/ecr013

DO - 10.1093/ijl/ecr013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858225382

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - International Journal of Lexicography

JF - International Journal of Lexicography

SN - 0950-3846

IS - 1

ER -