TY - JOUR
T1 - Third-party reporting and cross-border tax planning
AU - Edwards, Alexander
AU - Hutchens, Michelle
AU - V. Persson, Anh
N1 - We are thankful for helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers, Elisa Casi-Eberhard (discussant), Lisa De Simone, Nathan Goldman, Russ Hamilton, Trent Krupa (discussant), Becky Lester, Christina Lewellen, Barbara Stage (discussant), Jake Thornock (editor), Aruhn Venkat, Brady Williams, Yuchen Wu, Betty Xing (discussant), and seminar participants at Brigham Young University, North Carolina State University, Ohio State University, Southern Methodist University, University of Houston, University of Texas, the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting, the 2021 ATA Mid-year Meeting, the 11th EIASM Conference on Current Research in Taxation, and the 2nd Norwegian Tax Accounting Symposium. Edwards is grateful for the financial support of the Rotman School of Management. Hutchens and Persson acknowledge the financial support of the Gies College of Business.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - In 2018, the European Union (EU) introduced a new mandatory reporting requirement for a wide range of cross-border tax arrangements (EU Directive 2018/822, also known as DAC6). Unlike prior corporate transparency initiatives, which put the reporting responsibility primarily on the taxpayers, this directive puts the initial reporting responsibility on the third-party intermediaries who are involved in the reportable arrangement at any stage during the planning and execution process. We exploit the adoption of DAC6 in the EU to examine the effectiveness of third-party reporting in curbing cross-border tax planning by multinationals. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that affected firms reduce income shifting and report higher effective tax rates in the post-adoption period. The reduction in income shifting is stronger for affiliates operating in countries without legal professional privilege extensions and in countries where noncompliance penalties are higher. Our results highlight the importance of strong third-party reporting requirements in constraining cross-border tax planning.
AB - In 2018, the European Union (EU) introduced a new mandatory reporting requirement for a wide range of cross-border tax arrangements (EU Directive 2018/822, also known as DAC6). Unlike prior corporate transparency initiatives, which put the reporting responsibility primarily on the taxpayers, this directive puts the initial reporting responsibility on the third-party intermediaries who are involved in the reportable arrangement at any stage during the planning and execution process. We exploit the adoption of DAC6 in the EU to examine the effectiveness of third-party reporting in curbing cross-border tax planning by multinationals. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that affected firms reduce income shifting and report higher effective tax rates in the post-adoption period. The reduction in income shifting is stronger for affiliates operating in countries without legal professional privilege extensions and in countries where noncompliance penalties are higher. Our results highlight the importance of strong third-party reporting requirements in constraining cross-border tax planning.
KW - DAC6
KW - cross-border tax planning
KW - mandatory disclosure regime
KW - third-party reporting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189528081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85189528081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12943
DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12943
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85189528081
SN - 0823-9150
VL - 41
SP - 1248
EP - 1283
JO - Contemporary Accounting Research
JF - Contemporary Accounting Research
IS - 2
ER -