Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Sulfur-Rich Compounds

Jonathan G. Breitzer, Dana D. Dlott, Lawrence K. Iwaki, Sean M. Kirkpatrick, Thomas B. Rauchfuss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The molecular third-order optical nonlinearity γR (second hyperpolarizability or nonlinear refractive index) was measured for a series of sulfur-rich molecules: sulfur (S8), carbon-sulfur compounds, and metal thiolate clusters. Z-scan techniques (pulse width 27 ps, wavelength 527 nm) were used to measure these properties in solution by comparing the solution to the pure solvent. Our approach is an efficient way to evaluate a number of different compounds and to quickly direct synthetic strategies for improved nonlinear and linear optical properties. The optical nonlinearities were evaluated in terms of figures of merit, |W|/I0 and [T]-1, where |W|/I0 is the ratio of nonlinear refraction to linear absorption and [T]-1 is the ratio of nonlinear refraction to nonlinear absorption. Among the carbon-sulfur compounds, C6S8O2 had the largest figures of merit: |W|/I0 = 4.3 × 10-13 m2 W-1 and [T]-1 > 5. The metal thiolate cluster with the largest second hyperpolarizability was [Zn10S4(SPh)16]4-R = -7.8 × 10-56 C m4 V-3, -6.3 × 10-31 esu). This cluster exhibited no measurable linear or nonlinear absorption, so the figures of merit were effectively infinite. Previous work on the second hyperpolarizability of sulfur-rich compounds examined species that were hampered by substantial linear absorption coefficients. The present work shows that high figures of merit can be achieved without significant linear or nonlinear absorption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6930-6937
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume103
Issue number35
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Sulfur-Rich Compounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this