Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Taking this volume as a whole, the Afterword asks what assumptions about relations between human and nonhuman vitality emerge from these essays? Secondly, what do these engagements, these struggles, these entanglements between human and nonhuman animals, articulated in these texts, reveal about the current state of and potential for our collective work in “human‒animal studies”? Tying ontology—a theory of “being”—with ethics—a notion of implied and authorized “praxis”—the co-editors push us toward articulating what the ethical stakes are in interpreting largely literary texts. Acknowledging their goal, this afterword probes further to ask how a point of view from animal studies as an interdiscipline can provide an interpretive framework for literary texts based on an ontological‒ethical grounding. The ultimate question we face is how to theorize the complex linkages between literature and its interpretation and the material conditions of living animals.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBeyond the Human-Animal Divide
EditorsDominik Ohrem, Roman Bartosch
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK
Chapter15
Pages309-315
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-349-93437-9
ISBN (Print)978-1-137-60309-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 22 2017

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Animals and Literature

Fingerprint

Animals
Literary Text
Afterword
Stakes
Grounding
Nonhuman Animals
Entanglement
Linkage
Vitality
Nonhuman

Cite this

Desmond, J. (2017). Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”. In D. Ohrem, & R. Bartosch (Eds.), Beyond the Human-Animal Divide (pp. 309-315). (Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15

Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”. / Desmond, Jane.

Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. ed. / Dominik Ohrem; Roman Bartosch. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. p. 309-315 (Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Desmond, J 2017, Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”. in D Ohrem & R Bartosch (eds), Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15
Desmond J. Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”. In Ohrem D, Bartosch R, editors, Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2017. p. 309-315. (Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15
Desmond, Jane. / Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”. Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. editor / Dominik Ohrem ; Roman Bartosch. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. pp. 309-315 (Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature).
@inbook{787b9bdaf92141ebb58f62bd30c3fed9,
title = "Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”",
abstract = "Taking this volume as a whole, the Afterword asks what assumptions about relations between human and nonhuman vitality emerge from these essays? Secondly, what do these engagements, these struggles, these entanglements between human and nonhuman animals, articulated in these texts, reveal about the current state of and potential for our collective work in “human‒animal studies”? Tying ontology—a theory of “being”—with ethics—a notion of implied and authorized “praxis”—the co-editors push us toward articulating what the ethical stakes are in interpreting largely literary texts. Acknowledging their goal, this afterword probes further to ask how a point of view from animal studies as an interdiscipline can provide an interpretive framework for literary texts based on an ontological‒ethical grounding. The ultimate question we face is how to theorize the complex linkages between literature and its interpretation and the material conditions of living animals.",
author = "Jane Desmond",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "978-1-137-60309-8",
series = "Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan UK",
pages = "309--315",
editor = "Dominik Ohrem and Roman Bartosch",
booktitle = "Beyond the Human-Animal Divide",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Thinking about Talking about Writing about … “Animals”

AU - Desmond, Jane

PY - 2017/11/22

Y1 - 2017/11/22

N2 - Taking this volume as a whole, the Afterword asks what assumptions about relations between human and nonhuman vitality emerge from these essays? Secondly, what do these engagements, these struggles, these entanglements between human and nonhuman animals, articulated in these texts, reveal about the current state of and potential for our collective work in “human‒animal studies”? Tying ontology—a theory of “being”—with ethics—a notion of implied and authorized “praxis”—the co-editors push us toward articulating what the ethical stakes are in interpreting largely literary texts. Acknowledging their goal, this afterword probes further to ask how a point of view from animal studies as an interdiscipline can provide an interpretive framework for literary texts based on an ontological‒ethical grounding. The ultimate question we face is how to theorize the complex linkages between literature and its interpretation and the material conditions of living animals.

AB - Taking this volume as a whole, the Afterword asks what assumptions about relations between human and nonhuman vitality emerge from these essays? Secondly, what do these engagements, these struggles, these entanglements between human and nonhuman animals, articulated in these texts, reveal about the current state of and potential for our collective work in “human‒animal studies”? Tying ontology—a theory of “being”—with ethics—a notion of implied and authorized “praxis”—the co-editors push us toward articulating what the ethical stakes are in interpreting largely literary texts. Acknowledging their goal, this afterword probes further to ask how a point of view from animal studies as an interdiscipline can provide an interpretive framework for literary texts based on an ontological‒ethical grounding. The ultimate question we face is how to theorize the complex linkages between literature and its interpretation and the material conditions of living animals.

U2 - 10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15

DO - 10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_15

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-137-60309-8

T3 - Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature

SP - 309

EP - 315

BT - Beyond the Human-Animal Divide

A2 - Ohrem, Dominik

A2 - Bartosch, Roman

PB - Palgrave Macmillan UK

ER -