Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis

Derek R. Vardon, Brajendra K. Sharma, Grant V. Blazina, Kishore Rajagopalan, Timothy J. Strathmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Thermochemical conversion is a promising route for recovering energy from algal biomass. Two thermochemical processes, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL: 300 °C and 10-12. MPa) and slow pyrolysis (heated to 450 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min), were used to produce bio-oils from Scenedesmus (raw and defatted) and Spirulina biomass that were compared against Illinois shale oil. Although both thermochemical conversion routes produced energy dense bio-oil (35-37. MJ/kg) that approached shale oil (41. MJ/kg), bio-oil yields (24-45%) and physico-chemical characteristics were highly influenced by conversion route and feedstock selection. Sharp differences were observed in the mean bio-oil molecular weight (pyrolysis 280-360. Da; HTL 700-1330. Da) and the percentage of low boiling compounds (bp < 400 °C) (pyrolysis 62-66%; HTL 45-54%). Analysis of the energy consumption ratio (ECR) also revealed that for wet algal biomass (80% moisture content), HTL is more favorable (ECR 0.44-0.63) than pyrolysis (ECR 0.92-1.24) due to required water volatilization in the latter technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-187
Number of pages10
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume109
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

pyrolysis
energy
Pyrolysis
oil
biomass
Panthera
Biomass
Energy utilization
oil shale
liquefaction
Deoxyribonucleotides
Shale oil
Liquefaction
volatilization
moisture content
water
Alcuronium
Home Accidents
Chlorella
Competitive Binding

Keywords

  • Algae
  • Hydrothermal liquefaction
  • Pyrolysis
  • Scenedesmus
  • Spirulina

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis. / Vardon, Derek R.; Sharma, Brajendra K.; Blazina, Grant V.; Rajagopalan, Kishore; Strathmann, Timothy J.

In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 109, 04.2012, p. 178-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vardon, Derek R.; Sharma, Brajendra K.; Blazina, Grant V.; Rajagopalan, Kishore; Strathmann, Timothy J. / Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis.

In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 109, 04.2012, p. 178-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4929229012d2446c94db5ec8bbc432ad,
title = "Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis",
abstract = "Thermochemical conversion is a promising route for recovering energy from algal biomass. Two thermochemical processes, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL: 300 °C and 10-12. MPa) and slow pyrolysis (heated to 450 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min), were used to produce bio-oils from Scenedesmus (raw and defatted) and Spirulina biomass that were compared against Illinois shale oil. Although both thermochemical conversion routes produced energy dense bio-oil (35-37. MJ/kg) that approached shale oil (41. MJ/kg), bio-oil yields (24-45%) and physico-chemical characteristics were highly influenced by conversion route and feedstock selection. Sharp differences were observed in the mean bio-oil molecular weight (pyrolysis 280-360. Da; HTL 700-1330. Da) and the percentage of low boiling compounds (bp < 400 °C) (pyrolysis 62-66%; HTL 45-54%). Analysis of the energy consumption ratio (ECR) also revealed that for wet algal biomass (80% moisture content), HTL is more favorable (ECR 0.44-0.63) than pyrolysis (ECR 0.92-1.24) due to required water volatilization in the latter technique.",
keywords = "Algae, Hydrothermal liquefaction, Pyrolysis, Scenedesmus, Spirulina",
author = "Vardon, {Derek R.} and Sharma, {Brajendra K.} and Blazina, {Grant V.} and Kishore Rajagopalan and Strathmann, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.008",
volume = "109",
pages = "178--187",
journal = "Bioresource Technology",
issn = "0960-8524",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis

AU - Vardon,Derek R.

AU - Sharma,Brajendra K.

AU - Blazina,Grant V.

AU - Rajagopalan,Kishore

AU - Strathmann,Timothy J.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Thermochemical conversion is a promising route for recovering energy from algal biomass. Two thermochemical processes, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL: 300 °C and 10-12. MPa) and slow pyrolysis (heated to 450 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min), were used to produce bio-oils from Scenedesmus (raw and defatted) and Spirulina biomass that were compared against Illinois shale oil. Although both thermochemical conversion routes produced energy dense bio-oil (35-37. MJ/kg) that approached shale oil (41. MJ/kg), bio-oil yields (24-45%) and physico-chemical characteristics were highly influenced by conversion route and feedstock selection. Sharp differences were observed in the mean bio-oil molecular weight (pyrolysis 280-360. Da; HTL 700-1330. Da) and the percentage of low boiling compounds (bp < 400 °C) (pyrolysis 62-66%; HTL 45-54%). Analysis of the energy consumption ratio (ECR) also revealed that for wet algal biomass (80% moisture content), HTL is more favorable (ECR 0.44-0.63) than pyrolysis (ECR 0.92-1.24) due to required water volatilization in the latter technique.

AB - Thermochemical conversion is a promising route for recovering energy from algal biomass. Two thermochemical processes, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL: 300 °C and 10-12. MPa) and slow pyrolysis (heated to 450 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min), were used to produce bio-oils from Scenedesmus (raw and defatted) and Spirulina biomass that were compared against Illinois shale oil. Although both thermochemical conversion routes produced energy dense bio-oil (35-37. MJ/kg) that approached shale oil (41. MJ/kg), bio-oil yields (24-45%) and physico-chemical characteristics were highly influenced by conversion route and feedstock selection. Sharp differences were observed in the mean bio-oil molecular weight (pyrolysis 280-360. Da; HTL 700-1330. Da) and the percentage of low boiling compounds (bp < 400 °C) (pyrolysis 62-66%; HTL 45-54%). Analysis of the energy consumption ratio (ECR) also revealed that for wet algal biomass (80% moisture content), HTL is more favorable (ECR 0.44-0.63) than pyrolysis (ECR 0.92-1.24) due to required water volatilization in the latter technique.

KW - Algae

KW - Hydrothermal liquefaction

KW - Pyrolysis

KW - Scenedesmus

KW - Spirulina

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857441606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857441606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 178

EP - 187

JO - Bioresource Technology

T2 - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

SN - 0960-8524

ER -