Theories of risk management and multiple hazards: Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Regulatory policy can offer a rich resource for engineers who are interested in managing multiple risks. Like engineers, regulatory policymakers routinely face decisions about risks from multiple hazards. The chapter begins by presenting two observations about risk that regulatory theorists have come to recognize as posing core challenges to multi-risk management: countervailing risk, which is ancillary risk that arises when (in)action is taken to reduce a targeted risk; and reciprocal risk, or risks that develop from interactions between multiple sources and multiple behaviors. The chapter then provides an overview of three approaches used in regulatory risk management to respond to the challenges posed by multiple risks: the precautionary principle, cost-benefit analysis, and the capability approach. These different approaches interact differently with the challenges posed by countervailing and reciprocal risks, have different strengths and drawbacks, and can pull decisionmakers in different directions when managing multiple risks. Exploring the way that policymakers manage multiple risks-and the challenges they face in doing so-may thus provide valuable insights to engineers facing multiple hazards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMulti-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages493-505
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9783319297132
ISBN (Print)9783319297118
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Risk management
Hazards
hazard
Engineers
risk management
policy
precautionary principle
Cost benefit analysis
cost-benefit analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Rowell, K. A. (2016). Theories of risk management and multiple hazards: Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy. In Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering (pp. 493-505). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22

Theories of risk management and multiple hazards : Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy. / Rowell, Kristen Arden.

Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 493-505.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rowell, KA 2016, Theories of risk management and multiple hazards: Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy. in Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer International Publishing, pp. 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22
Rowell KA. Theories of risk management and multiple hazards: Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy. In Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer International Publishing. 2016. p. 493-505 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22
Rowell, Kristen Arden. / Theories of risk management and multiple hazards : Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy. Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer International Publishing, 2016. pp. 493-505
@inbook{04fddfb48eef4a01aff96bcdfbbf4c90,
title = "Theories of risk management and multiple hazards: Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy",
abstract = "Regulatory policy can offer a rich resource for engineers who are interested in managing multiple risks. Like engineers, regulatory policymakers routinely face decisions about risks from multiple hazards. The chapter begins by presenting two observations about risk that regulatory theorists have come to recognize as posing core challenges to multi-risk management: countervailing risk, which is ancillary risk that arises when (in)action is taken to reduce a targeted risk; and reciprocal risk, or risks that develop from interactions between multiple sources and multiple behaviors. The chapter then provides an overview of three approaches used in regulatory risk management to respond to the challenges posed by multiple risks: the precautionary principle, cost-benefit analysis, and the capability approach. These different approaches interact differently with the challenges posed by countervailing and reciprocal risks, have different strengths and drawbacks, and can pull decisionmakers in different directions when managing multiple risks. Exploring the way that policymakers manage multiple risks-and the challenges they face in doing so-may thus provide valuable insights to engineers facing multiple hazards.",
author = "Rowell, {Kristen Arden}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319297118",
pages = "493--505",
booktitle = "Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Theories of risk management and multiple hazards

T2 - Thoughts for engineers from regulatory policy

AU - Rowell, Kristen Arden

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Regulatory policy can offer a rich resource for engineers who are interested in managing multiple risks. Like engineers, regulatory policymakers routinely face decisions about risks from multiple hazards. The chapter begins by presenting two observations about risk that regulatory theorists have come to recognize as posing core challenges to multi-risk management: countervailing risk, which is ancillary risk that arises when (in)action is taken to reduce a targeted risk; and reciprocal risk, or risks that develop from interactions between multiple sources and multiple behaviors. The chapter then provides an overview of three approaches used in regulatory risk management to respond to the challenges posed by multiple risks: the precautionary principle, cost-benefit analysis, and the capability approach. These different approaches interact differently with the challenges posed by countervailing and reciprocal risks, have different strengths and drawbacks, and can pull decisionmakers in different directions when managing multiple risks. Exploring the way that policymakers manage multiple risks-and the challenges they face in doing so-may thus provide valuable insights to engineers facing multiple hazards.

AB - Regulatory policy can offer a rich resource for engineers who are interested in managing multiple risks. Like engineers, regulatory policymakers routinely face decisions about risks from multiple hazards. The chapter begins by presenting two observations about risk that regulatory theorists have come to recognize as posing core challenges to multi-risk management: countervailing risk, which is ancillary risk that arises when (in)action is taken to reduce a targeted risk; and reciprocal risk, or risks that develop from interactions between multiple sources and multiple behaviors. The chapter then provides an overview of three approaches used in regulatory risk management to respond to the challenges posed by multiple risks: the precautionary principle, cost-benefit analysis, and the capability approach. These different approaches interact differently with the challenges posed by countervailing and reciprocal risks, have different strengths and drawbacks, and can pull decisionmakers in different directions when managing multiple risks. Exploring the way that policymakers manage multiple risks-and the challenges they face in doing so-may thus provide valuable insights to engineers facing multiple hazards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017082342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017082342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_22

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85017082342

SN - 9783319297118

SP - 493

EP - 505

BT - Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -