The WTO dispute settlement system: The first ten years

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reviews the operation of the WTO's dispute settlement system during its first ten years - from 1995 to 2004. After a brief overview of the system, the experience of several major users of the system - the United States, the European Communities, Canada, Japan, Brazil and India - is examined and an evaluation is made in terms of how they have fared in advancing their major trade policy concerns on a subject matter and a country-by-country basis. Particular attention is paid to certain bilateral relationships, such as that of the United States and the EC. The paper then evaluates the system's success in settling disputes, in terms of whether disputes have been settled promptly, either through mutually agreed solutions or through implementation of panel/Appellate Body reports. The paper concludes that since its inception in 1995, the system has worked reasonably well in providing a reasonably effective mechanism through which WTO Members are able to resolve disputes, both at the consultation stage and following completion of formal dispute settlement proceedings. The system has not, however, achieved its goal of promptness in many cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-50
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of International Economic Law
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 12 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The WTO dispute settlement system: The first ten years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this