The violence of prediction: The uneasy relationship between social science and social policy

Mark S Aber, Julian Rappaport

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Neither the suggestion that certain categories of people be prevented from childbearing nor the suggestion that involuntary commitment of mental patients be made easier is justified by scientific analysis. Assertion that the high rate of violence in the United States is "caused by" inadequate socialization of biologically susceptible children raised by single parents is unjustified by available data. Similarly, results of recent studies predicting violence among the mentally ill provide only minimal implications for social policy. The problem of false positives continues, in both domains, to be a serious one, and the values, biases, and social constructions of "experts" will continue to influence their interpretation and presentation of available facts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-54
Number of pages12
JournalApplied and Preventive Psychology
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Keywords

  • Civil commitment
  • Crime and delinquency
  • Expert testimony
  • Mental illness
  • Prediction of violence
  • Single parents
  • Social policy
  • Social values
  • Violence and socialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The violence of prediction: The uneasy relationship between social science and social policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this