The various relations between law and morality in contemporary legal philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper is intended to be a summary of the author's views on the relationship between law and morality worked out over the past three decades in jurisprudence. The paper preliminarily clarifies the matter by isolating some lines of cleavage separating different questions askable about this relationship. With this done, the author argues for two theses. One, that judges are obligated to use morality in their decisions in particular cases; and two, that the morality judges are obligated to use in their judicial reasonings, is best seen as the natural lawyer sees it, namely, as being part of the law that obligates judges in their role as judges. The author not only believes these theses to be true; he also thinks that these theses are practically important, in that their acceptance by judges (and by the legal culture that reinforces judges) makes for better judging. Journal compilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-471
Number of pages37
JournalRatio Juris
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'The various relations between law and morality in contemporary legal philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this