TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of categories affects classification
AU - Ross, Brian H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Grant 89-0447 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Research for this paper was conducted at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology. I thank Gregory Murphy for a number of discussions and readings, and Lawrence Barsalou, Gary Dell, Mary Lassaline, Valerie Makin, Arthur Markman, Douglas Medin, Colleen Seifert, Edward Shoben, Edward Smith, and John Taplin for comments on this research. I also thank Amanda Lorenz, Amanda Schulze, and Lalita Pourchot for their excellent help in conducting these experiments.
PY - 1997/8
Y1 - 1997/8
N2 - Once an item is classified as a member of a category, knowledge about that category may be used. Most research has focused on classification rather than the use of category knowledge. Seven experiments show that in learning to classify and use categories, the use may affect later classifications. Five of the experiments employed a common classification paradigm in which symptom sets were classified into disease categories. After each classification, subjects used the category to decide what treatment should be given. The symptoms that were important for the treatments were later classified more accurately, generated earlier from the disease, and judged to have occurred more frequently. The last two experiments extended this work to new paradigms in which the category use required simple problem solving. Again, the use affected later classifications. The discussion addresses the implications of these results for classification theories and for the study of categories.
AB - Once an item is classified as a member of a category, knowledge about that category may be used. Most research has focused on classification rather than the use of category knowledge. Seven experiments show that in learning to classify and use categories, the use may affect later classifications. Five of the experiments employed a common classification paradigm in which symptom sets were classified into disease categories. After each classification, subjects used the category to decide what treatment should be given. The symptoms that were important for the treatments were later classified more accurately, generated earlier from the disease, and judged to have occurred more frequently. The last two experiments extended this work to new paradigms in which the category use required simple problem solving. Again, the use affected later classifications. The discussion addresses the implications of these results for classification theories and for the study of categories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031206601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031206601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jmla.1997.2515
DO - 10.1006/jmla.1997.2515
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031206601
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 37
SP - 240
EP - 267
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 2
ER -