The ultimatum game in the college football rivalry context

Brian M. Mills, Scott Tainsky, B. Christine Green, Becca Leopkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sport rivalries have been shown to increase the emotional intensity of fans, which not only can lead to higher levels of interest and involvement but can also escalate negative fan behaviors based on in-group/out-group distinctions. This study represents the first use of an experimental economics approach in sport management to understand the behaviors of rival sports fans. Specifically, the classic behavioral economics experiment, the ultimatum game, was used to test the willingness of rival fans to make their out-group counterparts worse off. Using a $10 stake, proposers offered approximately 8.7% less to rival fans than to in-group fans, while the probability that a responder accepted an offer-holding constant offer size-was approximately 7% lower when the proposer was a rival. Team identification had no effect on offers or acceptances. Implications for understanding rivalry in sport are discussed, and advantages of behavioral economics for sport management research are noted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-23
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Sport Management
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Keywords

  • Economics
  • Fan behavior
  • Rivalry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ultimatum game in the college football rivalry context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this