TY - JOUR
T1 - The two-part instrument in a second-best world
AU - Fullerton, Don
AU - Wolverton, Ann
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for suggestions from Allen Blackman, Firouz Gahvari, Robert Mohr, Ian Parry, Agnar Sandmo, Ronnie Schöb, Hilary Sigman and anonymous referees. Financial assistance was provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency (R824740-01-0) and the National Science Foundation (SBR-9811324). This paper is part of the NBER's research program in Public Economics. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the EPA, the NSF or the National Bureau of Economic Research.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Standard Pigovian tax theory has been extended in two directions. First, many polluting activities are difficult to tax because they are not market transactions, and so recent papers have shown that the same effects can be achieved by use of a two-part instrument (2PI): a tax on output or income and a subsidy for clean alternatives to pollution. It is a generalization of a deposit-refund system (DRS). Second, a different literature concerns the second-best pollution tax in the presence of other tax distortions. Here, we combine the two extensions by looking at the second-best 2PI. When government needs revenue, is the deposit larger and the rebate smaller? We find explicit solutions for each tax and subsidy in a general equilibrium model with other tax distortions, and we compare these to the rates in a first-best model. The tax-subsidy combination is explained in terms of a tax effect, an environmental effect and a revenue effect. The model allows for flexible interpretation to show various applications of the 2PI. We also discuss important caveats.
AB - Standard Pigovian tax theory has been extended in two directions. First, many polluting activities are difficult to tax because they are not market transactions, and so recent papers have shown that the same effects can be achieved by use of a two-part instrument (2PI): a tax on output or income and a subsidy for clean alternatives to pollution. It is a generalization of a deposit-refund system (DRS). Second, a different literature concerns the second-best pollution tax in the presence of other tax distortions. Here, we combine the two extensions by looking at the second-best 2PI. When government needs revenue, is the deposit larger and the rebate smaller? We find explicit solutions for each tax and subsidy in a general equilibrium model with other tax distortions, and we compare these to the rates in a first-best model. The tax-subsidy combination is explained in terms of a tax effect, an environmental effect and a revenue effect. The model allows for flexible interpretation to show various applications of the 2PI. We also discuss important caveats.
KW - Deposit-refund system
KW - Tax-subsidy
KW - Two-part instrument
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244457606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244457606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:23244457606
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 89
SP - 1961
EP - 1975
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
IS - 9-10
ER -