TY - JOUR
T1 - The trichoptera barcode initiative
T2 - A strategy for generating a species-level tree of life
AU - Zhou, Xin
AU - Frandsen, Paul B.
AU - Holzenthal, Ralph W.
AU - Beet, Clare R.
AU - Bennett, Kristi R.
AU - Blahnik, Roger J.
AU - Bonada, Núria
AU - Cartwright, David
AU - Chuluunbat, Suvdtsetseg
AU - Cocks, Graeme V.
AU - Collins, Gemma E.
AU - Dewaard, Jeremy
AU - Dean, John
AU - Flint, Oliver S.
AU - Hausmann, Axel
AU - Hendrich, Lars
AU - Hess, Monika
AU - Hogg, Ian D.
AU - Kondratieff, Boris C.
AU - Malicky, Hans
AU - Milton, Megan A.
AU - Morinière, Jérôme
AU - Morse, John C.
AU - Mwangi, François Ngera
AU - Pauls, Steffen U.
AU - Gonzalez, María Razo
AU - Rinne, Aki
AU - Robinson, Jason L.
AU - Salokannel, Juha
AU - Shackleton, Michael
AU - Smith, Brian
AU - Stamatakis, Lexandros
AU - St Clair, Ros
AU - Thomas, Jessica A.
AU - Zamora-Muñoz, Carmen
AU - Ziesmann, Tanja
AU - Kjer, Karl M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors.
PY - 2016/9/5
Y1 - 2016/9/5
N2 - DNA barcoding was intended as a means to provide species-level identifications through associating DNA sequences from unknown specimens to those from curated reference specimens. Although barcodes were not designed for phylogenetics, they can be beneficial to the completion of the Tree of Life. The barcode database for Trichoptera is relatively comprehensive, with data from every family, approximately two-thirds of the genera, and one-third of the described species. Most Trichoptera, as with most of life’s species, have never been subjected to any formal phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a phylogeny with over 16 000 unique haplotypes as a working hypothesis that can be updated as our estimates improve. We suggest a strategy of implementing constrained tree searches, which allow larger datasets to dictate the backbone phylogeny, while the barcode data fill out the tips of the tree. We also discuss how this phylogeny could be used to focus taxonomic attention on ambiguous species boundaries and hidden biodiversity. We suggest that systematists continue to differentiate between ‘Barcode Index Numbers’ (BINs) and ‘species’ that have been formally described. Each has utility, but they are not synonyms. We highlight examples of integrative taxonomy, using both barcodes and morphology for species description.
AB - DNA barcoding was intended as a means to provide species-level identifications through associating DNA sequences from unknown specimens to those from curated reference specimens. Although barcodes were not designed for phylogenetics, they can be beneficial to the completion of the Tree of Life. The barcode database for Trichoptera is relatively comprehensive, with data from every family, approximately two-thirds of the genera, and one-third of the described species. Most Trichoptera, as with most of life’s species, have never been subjected to any formal phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a phylogeny with over 16 000 unique haplotypes as a working hypothesis that can be updated as our estimates improve. We suggest a strategy of implementing constrained tree searches, which allow larger datasets to dictate the backbone phylogeny, while the barcode data fill out the tips of the tree. We also discuss how this phylogeny could be used to focus taxonomic attention on ambiguous species boundaries and hidden biodiversity. We suggest that systematists continue to differentiate between ‘Barcode Index Numbers’ (BINs) and ‘species’ that have been formally described. Each has utility, but they are not synonyms. We highlight examples of integrative taxonomy, using both barcodes and morphology for species description.
KW - Caddisfly
KW - DNA barcodes
KW - Integrative taxonomy
KW - Phylogeny
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982824313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982824313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2016.0025
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2016.0025
M3 - Article
C2 - 27481793
AN - SCOPUS:84982824313
SN - 0800-4622
VL - 371
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1702
M1 - 20160025
ER -