Abstract
STALWART STONE SENTINELS guarded the borders of seventeenth-century France. An interlocking system of strongholds barred her frontiers, particularly to the northeast, where the great engineer Vauban designed a double line of fortresses and fortified cities across traditional invasion routes. French fortifications proved their value in the wars of Louis XIV and saved revolutionary Paris a century later. But did these grim giants simply shelter France, or did they also shape her? The noted historian Geoffrey Parker argues that because the attack and defense of the new style of bastioned fortress demanded huge numbers of troops, European states increased the size of their armies to immense proportions. To take Parker’s assertion one step further, military expansion then compelled states to claim the authority and develop the institutions to marshal the vast resources demanded by gargantuan forces-voilà Absolutism. This article tests the theory that fortifications drove up army size in France, with all the attendant consequences.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Military Revolution Debate |
Subtitle of host publication | Readings on the Military Transformation of early Modern Europe |
Editors | Clifford J Rogers |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Pages | 169-200 |
Number of pages | 32 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429964817 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780813320540 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities