TY - JOUR
T1 - The Timing of Sexual Identity Development Milestones
T2 - Disentangling Age From Cohort Influences
AU - Bishop, Meg D.
AU - Fish, Jessica N.
AU - Russel, Stephen T.
N1 - This research was supported by the National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant F32AA030194 (awarded to Meg D. Bishop). Meg D. Bishop and Jessica N. Fish also acknowledge support from the University of Maryland Prevention Research Center Cooperative Agreement U48DP006382 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P2CHD041041 (awarded to the Maryland Population Research Center). Stephen T. Russell and Meg D. Bishop also acknowledge support from Grants P2CHD042849 and T32HD007081 awarded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin. Stephen T. Russell acknowledges generous support from the Priscilla Pond Flawn Endowment at the University of Texas at Austin. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
PY - 2024/7/25
Y1 - 2024/7/25
N2 - Prior studies have reported generational declines in the ages at which sexual minority people first experience sexual identity development milestones (e.g., first awareness of same-sex attraction, self-realization of a sexual minority identity, same-sex sexual behavior, and disclosure); yet most studies have relied on retrospective data from adults that may conflate maturational age influences with cohort influences. In the current study, we disentangled age from cohort influences on milestone timing by harmonizing secondary data from three large and diverse data sets of cisgender sexual minority adolescents ages 15–19 years old (n = 1,310; Mage = 17.34, SD = 1.30) collected at three distinct sociohistorical eras of sexual diversity (the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s). With three age-matched but sociohistorically distinct cohorts, we compared milestone timing and pacing across cohorts, as well as subgroup differences among adolescents with social identities at the intersections of cohort with sex, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity, respectively. A series of multiple regression models suggested that more recent generations of sexual minority adolescents reported earlier ages of first self-identification and disclosure than less recent generations; however, adolescents reported similar ages of awareness of same-sex attraction and same-sex sexual behavior across cohorts. Insights from this study build support for cohort differences in the timing of some sexual identity developmental processes and underscore the importance of accounting for both maturational age and sociohistorical change when measuring the sexual identity development processes of sexual minority youth.
AB - Prior studies have reported generational declines in the ages at which sexual minority people first experience sexual identity development milestones (e.g., first awareness of same-sex attraction, self-realization of a sexual minority identity, same-sex sexual behavior, and disclosure); yet most studies have relied on retrospective data from adults that may conflate maturational age influences with cohort influences. In the current study, we disentangled age from cohort influences on milestone timing by harmonizing secondary data from three large and diverse data sets of cisgender sexual minority adolescents ages 15–19 years old (n = 1,310; Mage = 17.34, SD = 1.30) collected at three distinct sociohistorical eras of sexual diversity (the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s). With three age-matched but sociohistorically distinct cohorts, we compared milestone timing and pacing across cohorts, as well as subgroup differences among adolescents with social identities at the intersections of cohort with sex, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity, respectively. A series of multiple regression models suggested that more recent generations of sexual minority adolescents reported earlier ages of first self-identification and disclosure than less recent generations; however, adolescents reported similar ages of awareness of same-sex attraction and same-sex sexual behavior across cohorts. Insights from this study build support for cohort differences in the timing of some sexual identity developmental processes and underscore the importance of accounting for both maturational age and sociohistorical change when measuring the sexual identity development processes of sexual minority youth.
KW - life course perspective
KW - milestones
KW - sexual identity development
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202745433
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202745433#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1037/sgd0000745
DO - 10.1037/sgd0000745
M3 - Article
C2 - 40786145
AN - SCOPUS:85202745433
SN - 2329-0382
JO - Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
JF - Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
ER -