Abstract
Disaster recovery poses difficult challenges to planners, however. Although there is a growing literature of individual recovery cases, few comparative studies exist, and few guidebooks tell planners how to do recovery. Only recently has a literature of recovery theory begun to grow. Gavin Smith, who served as the director of recovery and renewal for the State of Mississippi following Hurricane Katrina, describes in his Planning Note many of the connections between planning theory and disaster recovery. The contributions included in this special issue are of various types, from historical overviews, to deep analyses of particular cases, to comparative case studies. Some researchers in this issue drill deeply into community and neighborhood-level processes after catastrophic events and examine the interplay between plans and policies and the pace and nature of recovery. Others focus on critical decisions at higher levels of intervention. They document and measure the effectiveness of recovery efforts using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-292 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Planning Association |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2 2014 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Development
- Urban Studies
Cite this
The theory and practice of building back better. / Kim, Karl; Olshansky, Robert B.
In: Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 80, No. 4, 02.10.2014, p. 289-292.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The theory and practice of building back better
AU - Kim, Karl
AU - Olshansky, Robert B
PY - 2014/10/2
Y1 - 2014/10/2
N2 - Disaster recovery poses difficult challenges to planners, however. Although there is a growing literature of individual recovery cases, few comparative studies exist, and few guidebooks tell planners how to do recovery. Only recently has a literature of recovery theory begun to grow. Gavin Smith, who served as the director of recovery and renewal for the State of Mississippi following Hurricane Katrina, describes in his Planning Note many of the connections between planning theory and disaster recovery. The contributions included in this special issue are of various types, from historical overviews, to deep analyses of particular cases, to comparative case studies. Some researchers in this issue drill deeply into community and neighborhood-level processes after catastrophic events and examine the interplay between plans and policies and the pace and nature of recovery. Others focus on critical decisions at higher levels of intervention. They document and measure the effectiveness of recovery efforts using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
AB - Disaster recovery poses difficult challenges to planners, however. Although there is a growing literature of individual recovery cases, few comparative studies exist, and few guidebooks tell planners how to do recovery. Only recently has a literature of recovery theory begun to grow. Gavin Smith, who served as the director of recovery and renewal for the State of Mississippi following Hurricane Katrina, describes in his Planning Note many of the connections between planning theory and disaster recovery. The contributions included in this special issue are of various types, from historical overviews, to deep analyses of particular cases, to comparative case studies. Some researchers in this issue drill deeply into community and neighborhood-level processes after catastrophic events and examine the interplay between plans and policies and the pace and nature of recovery. Others focus on critical decisions at higher levels of intervention. They document and measure the effectiveness of recovery efforts using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923060817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923060817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01944363.2014.988597
DO - 10.1080/01944363.2014.988597
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84923060817
VL - 80
SP - 289
EP - 292
JO - Journal of the American Planning Association
JF - Journal of the American Planning Association
SN - 0194-4363
IS - 4
ER -