The Syntax of Defection and Cooperation: The Effects of the Implicit Sentences Nice Act Versus Act Nice on Behavior Change

Dolores Albarracín, Kenji Noguchi, Ira Fischler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The syntactic organization of incidentally presented word pairs may affect behavior by providing actors with implicit propositions about how to behave. In Experiment 1, participants who had already played turns of a mixed-motive game were less cooperative after an explicit propositional suggestion that they had been nice in prior turns but were more cooperative after the suggestion that they should be nice in upcoming turns. In three subsequent experiments, implicit priming with the phrase nice act produced greater levels of defection, implying that actors responded to the implicit suggestion that they had been sufficiently nice already. In contrast, act nice produced greater levels of cooperation, implying that actors responded to the implicit suggestion that they should try to be nicer in upcoming turns. These effects occurred outside of awareness and disappeared when the interval between the words was long and when behavior was measured after a delay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-305
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Goals
  • Language
  • Negotiations
  • Social cognition
  • Social interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Syntax of Defection and Cooperation: The Effects of the Implicit Sentences Nice Act Versus Act Nice on Behavior Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this