TY - JOUR
T1 - The sequential unfolding of first phase syntax
T2 - Tutorial and applications to development
AU - Rispoli, Matthew
N1 - The author acknowledges the support of National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R15DC005374-01 for the collection of the DeKalb cohort data, awarded to Matthew Rispoli (principal investigator, PI), and the support of National Science Foundation Grant BCS-082251, (awarded to Matthew Rispoli (PI) and Pamela Hadley (co-PI), for the collection of the Champaign cohort data. Collection of the DeKalb cohort data was conducted while the author was a faculty member at Northern Illinois University. The author would like to thank Ning Hsu, Yishin Tai, Macarena Galvez, and Henry Angulo for help in preparing the cross-linguistic comparisons contained in this tutorial. The author would also like to thank Ling-Yu Guo and Gillian Ramchand for their critical comments and Pamela Hadley for her insights about the clinical application of this framework and urging the author to write this tutorial.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Purpose: This tutorial is an introduction to first phase syntax (FPS; Ramchand, 2008). FPS provides a new, cross-linguistically motivated perspective on clause internal structure. A new sequence of syntactic development is proposed based on FPS with 4 levels of complexity: (0) verb particles and adjectives in the 1-word stage, (1) semantic relations of entity + location/attribution, (2) intransitive structures encoding change of location/state, and (3) transitive sentences with an internal argument that changes state/ location and an external, causer argument. A novel prediction of this framework is that a Level 2 structure emerges earlier than a Level 3 structure. Method: Archival longitudinal data of 15 children (8 boys) were selected to test the proposed developmental sequence. The 15 children’s data were drawn from the DeKalb corpora (Rispoli, Hadley, & Holt, 2008, 2009) and Champaign corpora (Hadley, Rispoli, Holt, Fitzgerald, & Bahnsen, 2014), selected because their mean lengths of utterance did not exceed 2.54 at age 2;6 (years;months). One-hour language samples taken every 3 months from 1;9 to 2;6 were searched for Level 1–3 structures. The diversity of the internal argument was tracked across levels. Results: Average argument diversity shifted across levels over the period of 1;9–2;6. At 2;0, argument diversity was highest for Level 1; at 2;3, diversity was highest for Level 2; and at 2;6, it was highest for Level 3. Paired-samples t test revealed that, at 2;3, argument diversity in Level 2 was significantly higher than that in Level 3. Conclusion: This developmental application of FPS provides a theoretical framework for a developmentally ordered sequence of syntactic goals and treatment targets for children struggling with the acquisition of syntax.
AB - Purpose: This tutorial is an introduction to first phase syntax (FPS; Ramchand, 2008). FPS provides a new, cross-linguistically motivated perspective on clause internal structure. A new sequence of syntactic development is proposed based on FPS with 4 levels of complexity: (0) verb particles and adjectives in the 1-word stage, (1) semantic relations of entity + location/attribution, (2) intransitive structures encoding change of location/state, and (3) transitive sentences with an internal argument that changes state/ location and an external, causer argument. A novel prediction of this framework is that a Level 2 structure emerges earlier than a Level 3 structure. Method: Archival longitudinal data of 15 children (8 boys) were selected to test the proposed developmental sequence. The 15 children’s data were drawn from the DeKalb corpora (Rispoli, Hadley, & Holt, 2008, 2009) and Champaign corpora (Hadley, Rispoli, Holt, Fitzgerald, & Bahnsen, 2014), selected because their mean lengths of utterance did not exceed 2.54 at age 2;6 (years;months). One-hour language samples taken every 3 months from 1;9 to 2;6 were searched for Level 1–3 structures. The diversity of the internal argument was tracked across levels. Results: Average argument diversity shifted across levels over the period of 1;9–2;6. At 2;0, argument diversity was highest for Level 1; at 2;3, diversity was highest for Level 2; and at 2;6, it was highest for Level 3. Paired-samples t test revealed that, at 2;3, argument diversity in Level 2 was significantly higher than that in Level 3. Conclusion: This developmental application of FPS provides a theoretical framework for a developmentally ordered sequence of syntactic goals and treatment targets for children struggling with the acquisition of syntax.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064328682
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064328682#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0227
DO - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0227
M3 - Article
C2 - 30950733
AN - SCOPUS:85064328682
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 62
SP - 693
EP - 705
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 3
ER -